2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.cj.2017.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving water-use efficiency by decreasing stomatal conductance and transpiration rate to maintain higher ear photosynthetic rate in drought-resistant wheat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
103
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 205 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
6
103
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, our findings are in agreement with the hypothesis about the dual effect of ABA on stomata, by regulating not only their aperture, but also their development (Chater et al 2014) and suggest that the observed differences in g s and consequently in WUE and drought sensitivity could at least partially result from leaf anatomy. Similar results were observed in rice and wheat (Li et al 2017; Ouyang et al 2017). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Therefore, our findings are in agreement with the hypothesis about the dual effect of ABA on stomata, by regulating not only their aperture, but also their development (Chater et al 2014) and suggest that the observed differences in g s and consequently in WUE and drought sensitivity could at least partially result from leaf anatomy. Similar results were observed in rice and wheat (Li et al 2017; Ouyang et al 2017). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Genotypic variation of ear water-stress tolerance has also been demonstrated by Li et al (2017), where a stresstolerant wheat variety displayed a conservative water-use strategy during post-anthesis by reducing leaf transpiration while maintaining high levels of ear gas exchange. Vicente et al (2018) postulated that water stress in wheat reduced the expression of photosynthetic genes (e.g.…”
Section: Photosynthetically Active Ear Componentsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In addition, evidence exists that plants adjust their stomatal density under water-stress conditions (Galm es et al, 2007b;Hamanishi et al, 2012). Reductions in stomatal density in water-stressed plants have been reported in Triticum aestivum (wheat; Li et al, 2017) and Spondias tuberosa (the umbu tree; Silva et al, 2009). In contrast, for other species, stomatal density increases under drought conditions, as in Phaseolus vulgaris (the common bean; Gan et al, 2010) and Leymus chinensis (Xu and Zhou, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%