2010 2nd International Conference on Evolving Internet 2010
DOI: 10.1109/internet.2010.49
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving VoIP Traffic Performance in WiMAX Networks

Abstract: Recently, a promising technology called WiMAX is providing wireless last-mile connectivity due to its high speed data rates, low cost of deployment, and large coverage area. Both MAC and Physical layer of this technology refer to the IEEE 802.16e standard, which defines five different data delivery service classes that can be used in order to satisfy Quality of Service (QoS) requirements of different applications, such as VoIP, FTP, videoconference, Web, etc. The main aim of this paper is to examine a case of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our paper, as in some relevant literature in the field , the focus is on considering impairments associated to loss and delay; for the other impairments, we have set the default values as suggested by the ITU‐T Recommendation G.107 . Accordingly, a simplified way of estimating the R factor is as follows: R=94.2IdIeeff where I d is a function of the one‐way delay d (in milliseconds): Id=0.024·d177.3>d0.024·d+0.11·(d177.3)d177.3 and I e − e f f , in case of the G.711 codec with random loss of packets, is as follows: Ieeff=30·ln(1+15e) where e identifies the packet loss .…”
Section: Proposed Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our paper, as in some relevant literature in the field , the focus is on considering impairments associated to loss and delay; for the other impairments, we have set the default values as suggested by the ITU‐T Recommendation G.107 . Accordingly, a simplified way of estimating the R factor is as follows: R=94.2IdIeeff where I d is a function of the one‐way delay d (in milliseconds): Id=0.024·d177.3>d0.024·d+0.11·(d177.3)d177.3 and I e − e f f , in case of the G.711 codec with random loss of packets, is as follows: Ieeff=30·ln(1+15e) where e identifies the packet loss .…”
Section: Proposed Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our paper, as in some relevant literature in the field [32][33][34][35][36][37][38], the focus is on considering impairments associated to loss and delay; for the other impairments, we have set the default values as suggested by the ITU-T Recommendation G.107 [31]. Accordingly, a simplified way of estimating the R factor is as follows:…”
Section: Mean Opinion Scorementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the authors mainly concentrated on the call quality measurement using the R-factor instead of the MOS. As I. Adhicandra stated in [7], with the use of ertPS instead of the UGS scheduling class, the BE performance can be increased because ertPS use a silence suppression mechanism. In this paper, the authors only consider the data over BE and also do not provide detail about the voice codec.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2010 QoS deployment over a cellular WiMAX network [4] was examined. The author has compared the performance obtained using two different QoS configurations differing from the delivery service class used to transport VoIP traffic, i.e.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%