2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ogla.2020.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Visual Field Trend Analysis with OCT and Deeply Regularized Latent-Space Linear Regression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, the complexity of data is reduced, the linear model is strengthened, and overfitting is reduced 11 . This method was used with deep learning models in several studies 1,2 . However, patients are unique even if they have the same pattern, leading to incorrect predictions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Consequently, the complexity of data is reduced, the linear model is strengthened, and overfitting is reduced 11 . This method was used with deep learning models in several studies 1,2 . However, patients are unique even if they have the same pattern, leading to incorrect predictions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yuhui et al 12 used a linear regression method in latent space for predicting glaucoma progression. Furthermore, a deeply regularized latent-space linear regression model was applied in another study 1 . However, due to the noisy data, the linear models failed to capture the correct glaucoma progression, especially when only a short series of previous VF was provided.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Deeply regularized latent space linear regression focuses on the coefficient and the intercept of the latent space linear regression of the measurement sets to address the heterogeneity in time. This model outperformed PLR 21,33 because glaucomatous VF damage results from the loss of retinal ganglion cells and VF threshold also fluctuates in both the short 4 and long 5 terms. Moreover, VF measurements are associated with considerable noise, 6,7 which hampers the accurate estimation of the speed of VF progression, 8 whereas OCT measurements are highly reproducible.…”
Section: Prediction Of Visual Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%