2022
DOI: 10.3389/fdata.2022.803685
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Variational Autoencoders for New Physics Detection at the LHC With Normalizing Flows

Abstract: We investigate how to improve new physics detection strategies exploiting variational autoencoders and normalizing flows for anomaly detection at the Large Hadron Collider. As a working example, we consider the DarkMachines challenge dataset. We show how different design choices (e.g., event representations, anomaly score definitions, network architectures) affect the result on specific benchmark new physics models. Once a baseline is established, we discuss how to improve the anomaly detection accuracy by exp… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This problem appears in many areas of science where a weak signal of interest is masked by background events due to light scattering, extraneous emission sources, etc. The location and the width of the signal can sometimes be guessed based on physical considerations; in other cases, consideration of multiple putative signal windows is necessary, as in LHC anomaly detection searches [40][41][42][43][44][45]. In both scenarios, only rough estimates of the position and the width of the signal window are required.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem appears in many areas of science where a weak signal of interest is masked by background events due to light scattering, extraneous emission sources, etc. The location and the width of the signal can sometimes be guessed based on physical considerations; in other cases, consideration of multiple putative signal windows is necessary, as in LHC anomaly detection searches [40][41][42][43][44][45]. In both scenarios, only rough estimates of the position and the width of the signal window are required.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their objective is the identification of events that can be considered outside the Standard Model (SM) density, and may thus point to new physics beyond the SM (BSM). The use of an explicit SM density estimator has been successful in a variety of anomaly detection tasks [15,[21][22][23][60][61][62][63]. Here, we apply the methods set out in the previous section to the datasets of the Dark Machines Anomaly Score Challenge [38].…”
Section: Anomaly Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of these models, normalizing flows have the particular advantage of simultaneously enabling event generation and likelihood evaluation, the latter of which is useful in other applications. As a result, they have been successfully used for a variety of tasks including event generation [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20], anomaly detection [21][22][23], unfolding [24], the calculation of loop integrals [25], and likelihood-free inference [26][27][28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of normalizing flows as a generative model is has been studied in works such as [105,67] in what is known as flow-based generative models, however such models do not incorporate an autoencoder structure. The use of autoencoder with normalizing flows, replacing optimal transport, is used for the sampling step generative models and this have been studied in [63,95].…”
Section: Generative Model Based On Multisymplectic Integratorsmentioning
confidence: 99%