Improving Vaccination Adherence in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Walker, Ted; Thomas, Alex; Cushing, Kelly C.; Michael, Bennett; Badillo, Ricardo; Sayuk, Greg; Gyawali, C. Prakash; Rubin, Deborah C.; Cherfane, Cynthia; Deepak, Parakkal; Ciorba, Matthew A.; Christophi, George P.

doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2019.05.032

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…After the elimination of duplicates, 1515 titles and abstracts were evaluated for eligibility; 1385 were excluded. On review of 148 full texts, 100 studies were included: 35 peer reviewed publications [ 16 – 50 ] and 65 conference abstracts [ 51 – 115 ]. Fig 1 details reasons for rejection.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Quality improvement exercises in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) services: A scoping review

Ridsdale,

Khurana,

Taslim

et al. 2024

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective Quality Improvement initiatives aim to improve care in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD). These address a range of aspects of care including adherence to published guidelines. The objectives of this review were to document the scope and quality of published quality improvement initiatives in IBD, highlight successful interventions and the outcomes achieved. Design/method We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and Web of Science. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data. We included peer reviewed articles or conference proceedings reporting initiatives intended to improve the quality of IBD care, with both baseline and prospectively collected follow-up data. Initiatives were categorised based on problems, interventions and outcomes. We used the Quality Improvement Minimum Quality Criteria Set instrument to appraise articles. We mapped the focus of the articles to the six domains of the IBD standards. Results 100 studies were identified (35 full text; 65 conference abstracts). Many focused on vaccination, medication, screening, or meeting multiple quality measures. Common interventions included provider education, the development of new service protocols, or enhancements to the electronic medical records. Studies principally focused on areas covered by the IBD standards ‘ongoing care’ and ‘the IBD service’, with less focus on standards ‘pre-diagnosis’, ‘newly diagnosed’, ‘flare management’, ‘surgery’ or ‘inpatient care’. Conclusion Good quality evidence exists on approaches to improve the quality of a narrow range of IBD service functions, but there are many topic areas with little or no published quality improvement initiatives. We highlight successful quality improvement interventions and offer recommendations to improve reporting of future studies.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Quality improvement exercises in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) services: A scoping review

Ridsdale,

Khurana,

Taslim

et al. 2024

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Three reports described the successful use of vaccination intake protocols to improve vaccination rates. 33,35,38 In 2 studies, clinic staff assisted in obtaining patients' vaccination history as part of their visit, thus identifying patients eligible for vaccination against influenza or pneumococcal pneumonia. 33,35 These patients were then offered vaccination at their clinic visit.…”

Section: Primary Prevention Metricsmentioning

confidence: 99%