Proceedings of the 19th Annual SIGdial Meeting on Discourse and Dialogue 2018
DOI: 10.18653/v1/w18-5026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving User Impression in Spoken Dialog System with Gradual Speech Form Control

Abstract: This paper examines a method to improve the user impression of a spoken dialog system by introducing a mechanism that gradually changes form of utterances every time the user uses the system. In some languages, including Japanese, the form of utterances changes corresponding to social relationship between the talker and the listener. Thus, this mechanism can be effective to express the system's intention to make social distance to the user closer; however, an actual effect of this method is not investigated en… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This situation differs from task-oriented dialogues, in which user satisfaction depends on the task success and dialogue cost Walker et al (1997). Kageyama et al (2018) investigated whether gradually controlling the form of a system's utterances can improve users' impression.…”
Section: User Satisfaction and Impression In Dialoguesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This situation differs from task-oriented dialogues, in which user satisfaction depends on the task success and dialogue cost Walker et al (1997). Kageyama et al (2018) investigated whether gradually controlling the form of a system's utterances can improve users' impression.…”
Section: User Satisfaction and Impression In Dialoguesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We recorded the two speakers' speech sounds so that one speaker's speech was recorded in one channel, and the visual data of speakers was captured from the front. The recorded dialog data were annotated with subjective closeness labels that can be used to studies of the non-task-oriented dialog systems [5]. In this paper, we describe a concrete procedure of the data collection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%