2013 International Conference on Culture and Computing 2013
DOI: 10.1109/culturecomputing.2013.62
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving User Control and Transparency in the Digital Humanities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a study of the update of machine learning in industry, Chiticariu et al [6] noted a gap in the volume of academic research on machine learning, compared with lower levels of uptake within industry and found the causes of this pertained to training data, interpretability and incorporation of domain knowledge. Similarly, the relatively low uptake of machine learning methods in the digital humanities has been attributed to issues pertaining to interpretation and trust [34,13,15]. Imparting domain knowledge into the process of text analysis through interpretation and annotation is also central to humanities research [17,37].…”
Section: Text Mining In the Humanitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a study of the update of machine learning in industry, Chiticariu et al [6] noted a gap in the volume of academic research on machine learning, compared with lower levels of uptake within industry and found the causes of this pertained to training data, interpretability and incorporation of domain knowledge. Similarly, the relatively low uptake of machine learning methods in the digital humanities has been attributed to issues pertaining to interpretation and trust [34,13,15]. Imparting domain knowledge into the process of text analysis through interpretation and annotation is also central to humanities research [17,37].…”
Section: Text Mining In the Humanitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interpretability of the algorithmic process and the incorporation of domain knowledge are essential to the use of machine learning and text mining in the semantic analysis of literature. The absence of these factors can inhibit adoption of machine learning approaches to text mining in the humanities, due to issues of accuracy and trust in what is often regarded as a 'black-box' process [6,13,15]. This paper presents Curatr, an online platform that incorporates domain expertise and imparts transparency in the use of machine learning for literary analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparable situation persists in digital humanities where despite an abundance of research developing automated methods for annotation many projects rely on manual annotation of text (Mahlow et al, 2012). This is due in large part to the domainspecificity of the language of many digital humanities corpora and the high levels of accuracy required to produce reliable analysis (Frank et al;2012, Hampson et al 2013.…”
Section: Automated Annotationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sample paragraphs belonging to each paragraph category were manually selected from the Ryan Report as training data for classifiers. In order to address the issue of the cost of compiling training data in digital humanities projects (Fran et al, 2012;Hampson et al, 2013), minimising the number of examples required was a guiding principle.…”
Section: Training Datamentioning
confidence: 99%