2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-75092-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving ultrasound images with elevational angular compounding based on acoustic refraction

Abstract: Ultrasound imaging is affected by coherent noise or speckle, which reduces contrast and overall image quality and degrades the diagnostic precision of the collected images. Elevational angular compounding (EAC) is an attractive means of addressing this limitation, since it reduces speckle noise while operating in real-time. However, current EAC implementations rely on mechanically rotating a one-dimensional (1D) transducer array or electronically beam steering of two-dimensional (2D) arrays to provide differen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To acquire the same number of images for compounding using different lenses, the translation step (δ) for each acoustic lens was selected by dividing the length of each lens ( l ) by the number of acquired images (N = 100; δ: 200 µm, 200 µm, 150 µm, 50 µm, 24 µm, for the 0°, 2.5°, 5°, 15°, and 30° acoustic lenses, respectively). The effective deflection angle was calculated using Snell’s law as c 1 sinØ 2 = c 2 sinØ 1 (where c 1 and c 2 are the longitudinal wave velocities, and Ø 1 and Ø 2 are incidence and exit angles in materials 1 and 2, respectively) 21 , 22 and confirmed experimentally in a similar manner to that reported in our previous study 18 . (“See supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 62%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…To acquire the same number of images for compounding using different lenses, the translation step (δ) for each acoustic lens was selected by dividing the length of each lens ( l ) by the number of acquired images (N = 100; δ: 200 µm, 200 µm, 150 µm, 50 µm, 24 µm, for the 0°, 2.5°, 5°, 15°, and 30° acoustic lenses, respectively). The effective deflection angle was calculated using Snell’s law as c 1 sinØ 2 = c 2 sinØ 1 (where c 1 and c 2 are the longitudinal wave velocities, and Ø 1 and Ø 2 are incidence and exit angles in materials 1 and 2, respectively) 21 , 22 and confirmed experimentally in a similar manner to that reported in our previous study 18 . (“See supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…To minimize speckle artefacts, compounding methods are preferable to image processing techniques because they yield both high quality images and reveal fine structures obscured by speckle noise, which are otherwise irretrievable using the aforementioned techniques 15 , 16 . EAC is a preferred spatial compounding technique with both high despeckling efficiency and good temporal resolution, which makes it favorable for real time imaging 18 . However, tight anatomical constraints of hollow organs prevent implementation of EAC in EUS using 2D or tilting 1D transducer arrays.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations