2021
DOI: 10.3892/etm.2021.10958
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving tissue characterization, differentiation and diagnosis in gynecology with the narrow‑band imaging technique: A systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[8][9][10] In particular, with narrow-band imaging, the distribution of capillaries was more clearly visible, [11,12] which improves the accuracy of hysteroscopy diagnosis, [13,14] and it appears to identify endometrial cancer earlier. [15,16] Studies on esophageal gastroscopy in this regard have been very mature, and the esophageal intraepithelial papillary capillary loops have been classified. Inoue summarized the abnormal shapes of capillary loop appear at 4 typical changes as follows: dilation, tortuous weaving, irregular caliber, and form variation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8][9][10] In particular, with narrow-band imaging, the distribution of capillaries was more clearly visible, [11,12] which improves the accuracy of hysteroscopy diagnosis, [13,14] and it appears to identify endometrial cancer earlier. [15,16] Studies on esophageal gastroscopy in this regard have been very mature, and the esophageal intraepithelial papillary capillary loops have been classified. Inoue summarized the abnormal shapes of capillary loop appear at 4 typical changes as follows: dilation, tortuous weaving, irregular caliber, and form variation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, it would obviate the need for an exogenous contrast agent that would require FDA approval and possibly additional time and/or procedures for contrast delivery and optimal uptake 3 5 . However, in principle the contrast of label-free images tends to be weak and requires more careful processing to extract signals that provide high levels of diagnostic accuracy 6 , 7 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%