Improving the Welfare of Companion Dogs—Is Owner Education the Solution?

Abstract

Simple SummaryThe welfare of most dogs living in homes is largely unknown. However, national surveys carried out by animal welfare charities and findings by animal welfare researchers have shown significant deterioration in some key aspects of dog welfare. For example, more dogs presenting to vets with behavioural problems, obesity, and ill-health due to poor breeding practices. This means that some dogs are suffering due to their owners’ behaviours or ownership practices. Educating dog owners as to how best to look after their dogs is, and has been seen by many, as key to improving the welfare of dogs living in homes. However, the concept of education, the context in which it occurs, and the lack of systematic evaluation of the effectiveness of education interventions means that nobody really knows if this approach works. This paper explores these concepts and draws together a wide range of sources of information to highlight some of the complexities of improving dog welfare by educating owners.AbstractVets, animal welfare charities, and researchers have frequently cited educating owners as a necessity for improving the welfare of companion dogs. The assumption that improving an owner’s knowledge through an education intervention subsequently results in improvements in the welfare of the dog appears reasonable. However, the complexity of dog welfare and dog ownership and the context in which these relationships occur is rapidly changing. Psychology has demonstrated that humans are complex, with values, attitudes, and beliefs influencing our behaviours as much as knowledge and understanding. Equally, the context in which we individuals and our dogs live is rapidly changing and responding to evolving societal and cultural norms. Therefore, we seek to understand education’s effectiveness as an approach to improving welfare through exploring and understanding these complexities, in conjunction with the relevant research from the disciplines of science education and communication. We argue that well designed and rigorously evaluated education interventions can play a part in the challenge of improving welfare, but that these may have limited scope, and welfare scientists could further consider extending cross-disciplinary, cross-boundary working, and research in order to improve the welfare of companion dogs.

Interaction and Emotional Connection with Pets: A Descriptive Analysis from Puerto Rico

“…Conclusive results were obtained regarding the feeling generated from their interactions with their pet(s) and the benefits they provided to the participants’ well-being from a biopsychosocial perspective, which is in line with previous research [ 58 , 84 ]. Additionally, the applied models showed that living with an animal provided important benefits for the humans, in agreement with the evidence found in recent research [ 28 , 85 , 86 , 87 ].…”

Expectations Versus Reality: Long-Term Research on the Dog–Owner Relationship

“…Although the owner-dog relationship is influenced by both canine and human characteristics [16], research suggests that the owner plays a very important part in the affective state and subsequent behavior of the dog [17]. The behaviors of owners toward their dogs are influenced by multiple factors [18], such as the owner's attitudes and beliefs about dogs, previous experiences with dogs, perceptions of society and peers, and biased views on personal knowledge and skills, as well as self-efficacy, which may change over time. Understanding people's attitudes and behaviors towards animals is challenging and complex but of great importance if we seek to prevent problems.…”

The New Era of Canine Science: Reshaping Our Relationships With Dogs

“…This is because the deficit model overlooks the underlying beliefs, existing attitudes and motivations for current practices. We now recognize that the deficit model is not the most effective way to communicate, engage stakeholders and effect change (22,23).…”