2010 IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology 2010
DOI: 10.1109/vast.2010.5652433
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the visual analysis of high-dimensional datasets using quality measures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their findings showed that experts were more consistent in their positive and negative ratings. Judging the value or quality of a visualization of dimensionally-reduced data should occur regardless of task, and analysts can additionally leverage automated quality metrics based on human perception [1,4]. We did not seek out novice analysts, though the domain experts we interviewed varied in terms of their perceived understanding of dimensionality reduction; furthermore, we sought to identify and characterize experts' tasks and activities in naturalistic settings, rather than in a controlled lab study.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their findings showed that experts were more consistent in their positive and negative ratings. Judging the value or quality of a visualization of dimensionally-reduced data should occur regardless of task, and analysts can additionally leverage automated quality metrics based on human perception [1,4]. We did not seek out novice analysts, though the domain experts we interviewed varied in terms of their perceived understanding of dimensionality reduction; furthermore, we sought to identify and characterize experts' tasks and activities in naturalistic settings, rather than in a controlled lab study.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their main objective is to rank a group of views according to their potential relevance. Quality metrics that can be used for evaluating performance views are metrics that are designed for pixel-based visualization techniques, for example, the NoiseDissimilarity measure [25], or the entropy and standard deviation that are used in the Pixnostics approach [26]. Whereas the Noise-Dissimilarity evaluates the mappings based on their dissimilarity to a noise function, Pixnostics evaluates them based on entropy or standard deviation.…”
Section: Methods For Automatic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These views are then analyzed for relevance with the NoiseDissimilarity method [25]. It evaluates the visual quality of an image based on a measure (the Noise-Dissimilarity measure NDM(g, g)) that quantifies the dissimilarity between the original image (with its gray values g) and the corresponding noise image (with its gray values g).…”
Section: Identifying Potentially Relevant Viewsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Albuquerque et. al [4] describe quality metrics for multivariate visualization techniques like scatterplot matrices and parallel coordinates in relation to the related tasks of analyzing clusters and separating labeled classes. In these approaches 2-D projections are ranked and visually analyzed.…”
Section: Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%