1987
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-1018229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the View in Emergency Endoscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1988
1988
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The two groups were comparable in age, sex, site of ulcer, and severity of bleeding. 10 12 No with duodenal ulcer 24 22 No with haemoglobin < 100 g/l 19 23 No in shock 11 11 No with spurting ulcer 9 10…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two groups were comparable in age, sex, site of ulcer, and severity of bleeding. 10 12 No with duodenal ulcer 24 22 No with haemoglobin < 100 g/l 19 23 No in shock 11 11 No with spurting ulcer 9 10…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gastric lavage was used only if a good view of the bleeding point could not be obtained, in which case an overtube was passed. Blood covering the ulcer was washed away with a “Waterpik.”14 Patients with actively bleeding ulcers (spurting or oozing haemorrhage) identified at the time of endoscopy were recruited into the present study. Patients with non-bleeding visible vessels, adherent blood clots, clean based ulcers, or ulcers with contact bleeding only were excluded.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%