Improving the value of care for appendectomy through an individual surgeon-specific approach

Robinson, Jamie R.; Carter, Nicholas H.; Gibson, Corinne; Brinkman, Adam S.; Arendonk, Kyle J. Van; Speck, K. Elizabeth; Danko, Melissa E.; Jackson, Gretchen Purcell; Lovvorn, Harold N.; Blakely, Martin L.

doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.02.081

Cited by 35 publications

(34 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In another example of cost improvement, Robinson et al looked to improve the value of care in pediatric appendectomies through a surgeon-specific approach [ 44 ]. In this prospective study, an automated dashboard for surgeon's operative expenditures was created, and monthly reports were generated for each physician.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Effect of Feedback on Surgeon Performance: A Narrative Review

Rankin

Brand

Wiznia

2020

Advances in Orthopedics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Surgeons play a critical role in the healthcare community and provide a service that can tremendously impact patients’ livelihood. However, there are relatively few means for monitoring surgeons’ performance quality and seeking improvement. Surgeon-level data provide an important metric for quality improvement and future training. A narrative review was conducted to analyze the utility of providing surgeons direct feedback on their individual performance. The articles selected identified means of collecting surgeon-specific data, suggested ways to report this information, identified pertinent gaps in the field, and concluded the results of giving feedback to surgeons. There is a relative sparsity of data pertaining to the effect of providing surgeons with information regarding their individual performance. However, the literature available does suggest that providing surgeons with individualized feedback can help make meaningful improvements in the quality of practice and can be done in a way that is safe for the surgeons’ reputation.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Effect of Feedback on Surgeon Performance: A Narrative Review

Rankin

Brand

Wiznia

2020

Advances in Orthopedics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Source Primary care practitioner [40]- [42], [45], [47]- [49], [52] General Practitioner [34] Clinician [9], [17]- [21], [31], [46], [50], [55], [56], [58], [59] Physician [5], [35], [39], [42], [44], [53] Nurse [4], [33], [36], [38], [42], [50] Medical Staff [4], [6], [7], [19], [21], [33], [37], [39], [43], [50], [51], [57] Pharmacist [40], [60] Administrator and Managers [36], [53], [57] Patient [4], [17]- [21], [52],…”

Section: Usersmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Name Source Identified Cognitive Activities Analytical reasoning [6], [39], [41], [53] Decision Making [31], [37], [40], [42], [44]- [46], [54], [55] Knowledge discovery [51] Planning [5] Problem Solving [50] Sense Making [33]…”

Section: Table 3 Conceptualization Of Human-data Interaction On Dasmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Safety Improvement [33], [39], [40] Satisfaction Improvement [17], [19], [21], [54] Health Outcomes Improvement [31], [32], [42]- [44] Better Communication with providers [4], [5], [17], [19], [21] value Improvement [5], [9], [39], [54], [55], [59], [60]…”

Section: Outcomes (Patients) Sourcesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Considering the results from sections 5.1, 5.4, and elements identified in section 2.2, we found that in a few cases, dashboards were used to enhance the quality of care and to choose the best treatment with better health outcomes and cost by tracking and monitoring data [5], [9], [39], [54], [55], [59], [60]. Frequently, in the majority of cases, it appears that HC organizations typically used and applied dashboards to control and monitor the quality of health services [31]- [36] [37] [38] and to improve the adherence to guidelines [6], [7], [44]- [49], internal process, and efficiency [19], [39]- [43], rather than tracking health outcomes and cost and enhancing value, and sharing the data about full cycle of care with other stakeholders.…”

Section: Dashboards Support For Value-based Hc Deliverymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Investigating Analytics Dashboards’ Support for the Value-based Healthcare Delivery Model

Mashinchi¹,

Ojo²,

Sullivan³

2020

Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Improving the value of care is one of the essential aspects of Value-Based Healthcare (VBHC) model today. VBHC is a new HC delivery model which is centered on patient health outcomes and improvements. There is anecdotal evidence that the use of decision aid tools like dashboards can play a significant role in the successful implementation of VBHC models. However, there has been little or no systematic studies and reviews to establish the extent to which analytics dashboards are used to support patient care in a VBHC delivery context. This paper bridges this knowledge gap through a systematic review of the existing literature on dashboards in the HC domain. Our study reveals dashboard capabilities as an enabling tool for value improvements and provides insight into the design of dashboards. This study concludes by highlighting a few gaps, question, and need for research in the future.The need for HC services is rising due to growing global demand and population, the burden of increasingly complicated chronic disease [8]. With

show abstract