2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2018.04.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the validation of ecological niche models with remote sensing analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The total number of occurrence records was divided into 70% for training and 30% for validation [45,46], with five replications for calibration of the adjusted models. For the RF, CTA, and GBM algorithms, the processing considered the number of pseudo-absences (PAs) equal to the number of occurrence points of the species.…”
Section: Algorithms Used Processing Parameters and Model Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total number of occurrence records was divided into 70% for training and 30% for validation [45,46], with five replications for calibration of the adjusted models. For the RF, CTA, and GBM algorithms, the processing considered the number of pseudo-absences (PAs) equal to the number of occurrence points of the species.…”
Section: Algorithms Used Processing Parameters and Model Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For examples, photosynthetic activity derived from a SPOT-NDVI time series at a 1 km spatial resolution was used to classify the potential extent of tree species [30], and LiDAR-derived light availability was used to classify the potential extent of understory species [31]. Interestingly, several studies classified the potential area of vegetation using topo-climatic variables and then classified the actual vegetation area using vegetation variables [5,32,33].…”
Section: Identifying Potential Restoration or Invasion Areasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To decrease the bias in statistical accuracy indices, several studies based on "presenceonly" classifiers included absence reference data extracted from RS images and/or vegetation maps to estimate classification accuracy using Kappa, overall accuracy, or F1-score indices [5,32,51,73,137]. Besides, the literature review highlights that spatial autocorrelation in reference data was usually ignored (Table 9).…”
Section: Assessing Classification Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The integration of remote sensing (RS) products into the development of ENMs has gained signi cant attention in recent years (see Sillero et al, 2009Sillero et al, , 2012Campos et al, 2023;Regos et al, 2022). This upward trend continues to increase due to the potential to enhance the performance of ENMs, improving multi-scale accuracy and detailed estimations of species' conservation status (Arenas-Castro & Sillero, 2021; Campos et al, 2023;José-Silva et al, 2018;Randin et al, 2020). It also provides knowledge of habitat quality and dynamics through in-depth analysis (Regos et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%