2020
DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2019.305439
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the Use of Mortality Data in Public Health: A Comparison of Garbage Code Redistribution Models

Abstract: Objectives. To describe and compare 3 garbage code (GC) redistribution models: naïve Bayes classifier (NB), coarsened exact matching (CEM), and multinomial logistic regression (MLR). Methods. We analyzed Taiwan Vital Registration data (2008–2016) using a 2-step approach. First, we used non-GC death records to evaluate 3 different prediction models (NB, CEM, and MLR), incorporating individual-level information on multiple causes of death (MCDs) and demographic characteristics. Second, we applied the best-perfo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study illustrated that the CEM prefer better than the LR. However, another study (15) conducted that multinomial logistic regression was the suitable model for GC redistribution, compared to naive Bayes classi er and CEM. The reason for the different results might be that Taiwan, which owns 23 million population, has a larger population quantity than that of Weifang or Xuanwei.…”
Section: Difference Between the Two Redistribution Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study illustrated that the CEM prefer better than the LR. However, another study (15) conducted that multinomial logistic regression was the suitable model for GC redistribution, compared to naive Bayes classi er and CEM. The reason for the different results might be that Taiwan, which owns 23 million population, has a larger population quantity than that of Weifang or Xuanwei.…”
Section: Difference Between the Two Redistribution Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, there is a growing body of literature on national BoD assessments. [e.g., 9 , 14 – 16 ] In Belgium, the national institute for health, Sciensano, initiated the Belgian national burden of disease study (BeBOD) in 2016, to generate DALY estimates rooted in local data and evidence. This article presents the four-step method used in BeBOD to redistribute IDDs making use of multiple causes of death data, and provides a quantification of the fatal BoD in Belgium for the period 2004–2019.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%