2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.10.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the use of ground-based radar rainfall data for monitoring and predicting floods in the Iguaçu river basin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding indirect methods, weather radars provide precipitation estimates with high spatial and temporal resolution but have limited accuracy in mountainous regions and cold climates [5,8]. On the other hand, satellite estimates of precipitation provide vast spatial and temporal coverage and are freely available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding indirect methods, weather radars provide precipitation estimates with high spatial and temporal resolution but have limited accuracy in mountainous regions and cold climates [5,8]. On the other hand, satellite estimates of precipitation provide vast spatial and temporal coverage and are freely available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors [2,4,5] provide reviews of the application of machine learning-based models for this purpose. Several streamflow forecasting studies [23][24][25][26][27] use data-driven models employing radar-derived rainfall as input; this requires a preliminary step for transforming reflectivity (native ground radar variable) into rainfall rate [14]. Either way, derivation of radar rainfall estimates remains an intensive task that needs to be tackled before using ground radar data for discharge forecasting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Precipitation is a major component of the hydrologic cycle and is the critical input for hydrological models [62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74]. Accurate and continuous precipitation estimates are essential for reliable hydrological simulations of fluxes and states [17,73,75]. However, poor precipitation observations (e.g., poor continuity in time and space) may lead to non-linear propagated errors in streamflow simulations [66,[76][77][78][79].…”
Section: Remotely Sensed Precipitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, prior to their implementation to the hydrological model, SREs require thorough validation and commonly need bias correction based on rain gauge data [17,71,74,78,89,91,102,103]. Falck et al (2018) [75] concluded that the corrected radar rainfall estimates reduced the systematic error of the streamflow ensemble for most sub-basins compared with the rain gauge, and significantly improved the simulated streamflow during nine flood events. Zhang et al (2019) [17] discovered that the adjusted TMPA 3b42V7 improved the performance of the simulated streamflow better than the original TMPA 3b42V7 data, and performed even better than rain-gauge observation in the validation period.…”
Section: Remotely Sensed Precipitationmentioning
confidence: 99%