2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122628
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the sulfate attack resistance of concrete by using supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs): A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
39
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
1
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is unreasonable. Previous studies have shown that prolongation of the initial moisture curing time is beneficial to cement hydration and pore structure development, and sulphate attack resistance should not decrease with prolongation of the initial moisture curing time [23,27]. Therefore, the compressive strength cannot be used as an index to evaluate sulphate attack resistance of rectangular mortars in semi-immersion tests.…”
Section: Sulphate Attackmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is unreasonable. Previous studies have shown that prolongation of the initial moisture curing time is beneficial to cement hydration and pore structure development, and sulphate attack resistance should not decrease with prolongation of the initial moisture curing time [23,27]. Therefore, the compressive strength cannot be used as an index to evaluate sulphate attack resistance of rectangular mortars in semi-immersion tests.…”
Section: Sulphate Attackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to silica fume and fly ash, metakaolin has a very high reactivity level [23]. Previous studies have shown that metakaolin can increase the mechanical strength of concrete to varying degrees, depending mainly on the replacement rate of metakaolin, the water/binder ratio, and the age at testing [22,23,27]. Remarkably, metakaolin has a positive effect on reducing drying shrinkage and improving durability [22,23,[27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, due to the use of SCMs, differences in the microstructure are observed in cement and concrete, consisting in the reduction of the total volume of open pores in the hardened cement paste and in the contact zone between paste and aggregate grains. This improves the performances of cement-based composites, especially in terms of durability, or of resistance to an aggressive environment (due to carbonation [ 9 ], presence of chloride ions [ 10 ], sulphates [ 11 ], etc. ), by increasing, for instance, water tightness [ 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies showed that replacing cement with SCMs enhances economical and sustainable construction [24][25][26]. CO 2 emissions per unit compressive strength of concrete are reduced when 20% cement is replaced with SCMs [27,28]. Besides the environmental benefits, replacing with SCMs increases the mechanical strength of concrete due to their pozzolanic nature [29][30][31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides the environmental benefits, replacing with SCMs increases the mechanical strength of concrete due to their pozzolanic nature [29][30][31]. In addition, it enhances the durability of concrete due to the improved pore structure [26,27,[32][33][34]. Hence, replacing cement with SCMs is a good choice to reduce the use of cement and enhance concrete strength and durability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%