Improving the Software Inspection Process

Abstract

Abstract. In this paper we look at the results from three experiments. We discuss the results and combine them into advices for code inspection. The main observations are that 1) it is beneficial to use large inspection groups in order to have access to a large amount of diverse experience and knowledge, 2) hands-on experience is more important than general knowledge and experience and 3) if left on their own, large groups tend to use a voting-like mechanism when deciding which defects to report after the group meeting.

A simplified model for software inspection

“…In another work, Stalhane and Awan suggested three points to improve the inspection process: (i) use of large inspection groups in order to have access to a wide diversity in expertise and experience; (ii) hands‐on experience is more important than general knowledge and experience; and (iii) when left to their own criteria, large groups tend to use a voting‐like mechanism when deciding what to adopt after the group meeting. The suggested points are effective, but again, organisations with limited resources could not support these large inspection groups.…”