2014
DOI: 10.1063/1.4865057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the reliability of automated non-destructive inspection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, this would be consistent with the actual mapping work of the ANNs systems, namely, classification and characterization, 138 and studies indicate that by applying a threshold to the probability value, it would actually be easier to assess the fusion results using the hit-miss rate 18 or false alarm criteria. 26,139 However, it appears the outputs of most of the studies in this area only provide Boolean values between 0 and 1 (i.e., flawed or nonflawed), whereas in real-time applications, detailed information about the structure (e.g., size, orientation, location of the flaw, etc.) is often needed.…”
Section: Artificial Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, this would be consistent with the actual mapping work of the ANNs systems, namely, classification and characterization, 138 and studies indicate that by applying a threshold to the probability value, it would actually be easier to assess the fusion results using the hit-miss rate 18 or false alarm criteria. 26,139 However, it appears the outputs of most of the studies in this area only provide Boolean values between 0 and 1 (i.e., flawed or nonflawed), whereas in real-time applications, detailed information about the structure (e.g., size, orientation, location of the flaw, etc.) is often needed.…”
Section: Artificial Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%