2010
DOI: 10.1080/08865710903508050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the Quality of Services in Residential Treatment Facilities: A Strength-based Consultative Review Process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings indicate that there is a need to improve the implementation quality of correctional programs, however, in the fields of youth care and correctional treatment, in contrast to the fields of health care and education (Grimshaw et al, 2001;Kretlow & Bartholomew, 2010); studies examining efforts to improve the implementation quality and outcomes of interventions are almost non-existent. We found only one study that tried to improve the quality of services in residential treatment facilities for youth (Pavkov, Lourie, Hug, & Negash, 2010). Pavkov et al (2010) used a quality assurance review form and a program review form to evaluate the quantity and quality of service delivery in seven areas of residential programming.…”
Section: Improving Program Integrity and Effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings indicate that there is a need to improve the implementation quality of correctional programs, however, in the fields of youth care and correctional treatment, in contrast to the fields of health care and education (Grimshaw et al, 2001;Kretlow & Bartholomew, 2010); studies examining efforts to improve the implementation quality and outcomes of interventions are almost non-existent. We found only one study that tried to improve the quality of services in residential treatment facilities for youth (Pavkov, Lourie, Hug, & Negash, 2010). Pavkov et al (2010) used a quality assurance review form and a program review form to evaluate the quantity and quality of service delivery in seven areas of residential programming.…”
Section: Improving Program Integrity and Effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there were no causally demonstrated outcomes, the reviewed articles suggested that more personalised treatment plans (Chorpita & Daleiden, 2014;Toivakka, 2012), and improved coordination of care (Holum, 2012;Pavkov, Lourie, Hug, & Negash, 2010) were linked with engaging mental health consumers in treatment planning. These were seen as enhancing the young person's interactions with the health care system (Day, 2008;Howe et al, 2011;Mirabito, 2006) by increasing their control and influence (Amodeo & Collins, 2007;Day, 2008;Holum, 2012;LeFrançois, 2008;Prilleltensky, Peirson, Gould, & Nelson, 1997;Walker, Thorne, Powers, & Gaonkar, 2009) and improving their quality of life.…”
Section: Outcomes Of Collaborative Treatment Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• New skills and an increased sense of mastery (Day, 2008;Holum, 2012;Howe et al, 2011;Mirabito, 2006), enhanced ability to manage their own goals (Holum, 2012), as well as better functional outcomes (Kjellberg, Kåhlin, Haglund, & Taylor, 2012;Pavkov et al, 2010;Schauer et al, 2007).…”
Section: Outcomes Of Collaborative Treatment Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This process was adapted from a process initially developed for the review of residential treatment facilities (Pavkov, Hug, Lourie, & Negash, 2010;Pavkov, Negash, Lourie, & Hug, in press). The Purdue University Institutional Review Board reviewed and approved all study procedures and protocols.…”
Section: Study Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%