2019
DOI: 10.5851/kosfa.2019.e9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the Quality of Response Surface Analysis of an Experiment for Coffee-Supplemented Milk Beverage: I. Data Screening at the Center Point and Maximum Possible R-Square

Abstract: Response surface methodology (RSM) is a useful set of statistical techniques for modeling and optimizing responses in research studies of food science. As a design for a response surface experiment, a central composite design (CCD) with multiple runs at the center point is frequently used. However, sometimes there exist situations where some among the responses at the center point are outliers and these outliers are overlooked. Since the responses from center runs are those from the same experimental condition… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The predicted determination (pred-R 2 ) values for alcohol content and TSS were not as close to the adjusted determination (adj-R 2 ) indicating a slight limitation with the model (Table 5 ). A consideration of outliers, model reduction, and response transformation may improve the empirical model 37 . In contrast, the predicted determination (pred-R 2 ) of 0.89 in the pH optimization model was reasonably close to the adjusted determination (adj-R 2 ) of 0.97, thus confirming the model’s accuracy in correctly predicting responses (Table 5 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The predicted determination (pred-R 2 ) values for alcohol content and TSS were not as close to the adjusted determination (adj-R 2 ) indicating a slight limitation with the model (Table 5 ). A consideration of outliers, model reduction, and response transformation may improve the empirical model 37 . In contrast, the predicted determination (pred-R 2 ) of 0.89 in the pH optimization model was reasonably close to the adjusted determination (adj-R 2 ) of 0.97, thus confirming the model’s accuracy in correctly predicting responses (Table 5 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extraction at the central point (or centroid) represents an equal contribution of all three solvents (0.333, 0.333, 0.333). Runs 7–9, representing the extraction in three replicates, allow estimating the variation in the responses at the central point and provides a basis for the lack-of-fit test [ 78 , 79 ]. The response function was the TPC, which was evaluated in two different advanced breeding lines.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The original data to be used for re-analysis is the data described in Ahn et al (2017), in which they tried to optimize manufacturing conditions for improving storage stability of coffee-supplemented milk beverage by using RSM. Through data screening, one outlier was deleted from their data (Rheem and Oh, 2019). The response variables, Y 1 and Y 2 , and the factors in this experiment are described in Table 1A.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A dataset, which is obtained through the screening of the data in Ahn et al (2017), will be re-analyzed for the illustration of the remedy suggested in this research note. Since Ahn et al (2017) has two responses and a purpose of it is the multi-response optimization of them, this research note, which is a continuation of Rheem and Oh (2019), will model both responses by using heterogeneous third-order models, and optimize them simultaneously by employing the desirability function technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%