Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCAS Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies 2018
DOI: 10.1145/3209811.3209815
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the Quality of Point of Care Diagnostics with Real-Time Machine Learning in Low Literacy LMIC Settings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to estimate the FHR, the quality of the 3.75-s window was also assessed and stored for further prepossessing steps. The quality was assessed using the method presented in Valderrama et al ( 2018a ) (see subsection 3.1.3).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition to estimate the FHR, the quality of the 3.75-s window was also assessed and stored for further prepossessing steps. The quality was assessed using the method presented in Valderrama et al ( 2018a ) (see subsection 3.1.3).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The features were fed into a classifier composed of a logistic regression and a multiclass support vector machine to classify the 3.75-s window into good quality, interference, silence, talking in the background, or low signal to noise ratio. More details of the quality assessment method can be found in Valderrama et al (2017Valderrama et al ( , 2018a.…”
Section: Data Inclusion Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The removal of features meant feature extraction times were markedly reduced from 1.12 s to 130 ms, and 2.16 s to 120 ms for heart and lung respectively. Real-time processing is less than 400 ms processing time, which is satisfied with both feature-based classifiers and the deep learning model; however, these processing times were achieved with a MacBook Pro [10]. Similar results would be expected if a desktop computer in a hospital setting or phone connected to cloud computing, whereas using phone onboard processing would be slower.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…By observing the frequency components of the 1D-DUS signals, the cut-off frequencies were set to 25 and 600 Hz, corresponding to cardiac oscillations. In addition, the signal quality assessment method presented in (29) was used before processing to exclude low quality recordings. After the quality assessment, each 5 minutes recording was devided into 3.75 seconds and the scalogram was generated using 50 ms Hanning window for better representation of the signal in time and frequency.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%