2022
DOI: 10.5194/egusphere-2022-2
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the prediction of the Madden-Julian Oscillation of the ECMWF model by post-processing

Abstract: Abstract. The Madden-Julian Oscillation (MJO) is a major source of predictability on the sub-seasonal (10- to 90-days) time scale. An improved forecast of the MJO, may have important socioeconomic impacts due to the influence of MJO on both, tropical and extratropical weather extremes. Although in the last decades state-of-the-art climate models have proved their capability for forecasting the MJO exceeding the 5 weeks prediction skill, there is still room for improving the prediction. In this study we use Mul… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, we compared quantitatively the SWG forecast with the ECMWF forecast Figure 10. The ECMWF reforecats were taken from (Silini et al, 2022). We found that the ECMWF forecast has highest correlation until 20 days compared to the SWG forecast.…”
Section: Average Amplitude Errormentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, we compared quantitatively the SWG forecast with the ECMWF forecast Figure 10. The ECMWF reforecats were taken from (Silini et al, 2022). We found that the ECMWF forecast has highest correlation until 20 days compared to the SWG forecast.…”
Section: Average Amplitude Errormentioning
confidence: 93%
“…However, for lead times of 20 days the RMSE of ECMWF forecast coincides with the RMSE of the SWG, which shows the improvement of the SWG forecast to lead time above 20 days. The skill scores of the ECMWF (COR and RMSE) (Silini et al, 2022) are computed for each lead time, which is different from our way of computing the skill score (considering the average lead time). Of course, this comparison was made to check the performance of our forecast and not to say that the SWG model can replace a numerical prediction.…”
Section: Average Amplitude Errormentioning
confidence: 99%