Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2016
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the Pipeline for Developing and Testing Pharmacological Treatments in Pregnancy

Abstract: In a Perspective, Lucy Chappell and Anna David discuss ways to develop and test pharmacological treatments in pregnancy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More work is still needed in this area; however, especially since the current heterogeneity within these three ‘diseases’ also complicates the design and conduct of clinical trials for obstetric therapies. This, in turn, increases the risk that a pharmaceutical company will not see a return on their investment and so deters their participation in the field …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More work is still needed in this area; however, especially since the current heterogeneity within these three ‘diseases’ also complicates the design and conduct of clinical trials for obstetric therapies. This, in turn, increases the risk that a pharmaceutical company will not see a return on their investment and so deters their participation in the field …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This, in turn, increases the risk that a pharmaceutical company will not see a return on their investment and so deters their participation in the field. 4,66…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These examples show how some of the barriers caused by regulatory and other trial processes can be overcome to include pregnant and breastfeeding women even within a rapidly evolving pandemic. As increasing numbers of women are entering pregnancy with pre-existing conditions and may potentially benefit from newer therapies, now is the time to default to including, rather than excluding, pregnant and breastfeeding women in general clinical trials 12. The RECOVERY trial is an example of success in equity for pregnant women, but the number of included women remains small and planned international meta-analyses of trial subgroup data on pregnant women will be essential.…”
Section: Changing the Defaultmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bearing in mind the burden of disease caused by pre-eclampsia and FGR, it may be reasonably asked why there have been so few advances in therapeutic options available to the obstetrician over the last 30 years or so and why there are so few clinical trials in this area ( Fisk & Atun 2008 , Chappell & David 2016 ). The main reason is probably the difficulty of developing drugs for conditions where there are two people involved, mother and fetus, and the consequent increased risk of side effects.…”
Section: Pre-clinical Strategies For Testing Potential Therapeutic Trmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…delaying labour or inducing labour). In fact, there have been very few therapeutic advances in obstetrics in the last 30 years ( Fisk & Atun 2008 , Chappell & David 2016 ). Whilst aspirin prophylaxis for women at high-risk pre-eclampsia, for example, is now a recommendation ( https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/qs35/chapter/quality-statement-2-antenatal-assessment-of-pre-eclampsia-risk ), it is only recently that researchers have considered the possibility of treating the dysfunctional placenta itself.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%