2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10586-018-2421-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the performance of Smith–Waterman sequence algorithm on GPU using shared memory for biological protein sequences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For detecting orthologs of SV proteins in AIV proteins, four different scores were calculated between each of the 294 SV proteins and each of the 74 AIV proteins. Primary structure similarity score: Smith-Waterman sequence alignment [ 45 ] was performed on all 21756 sequence pairs without any opening gap penalty but with −2 penalty score for the extension gap. Blocks substitution matrix 62 (BLOSUM62) was considered as scoring matrix.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For detecting orthologs of SV proteins in AIV proteins, four different scores were calculated between each of the 294 SV proteins and each of the 74 AIV proteins. Primary structure similarity score: Smith-Waterman sequence alignment [ 45 ] was performed on all 21756 sequence pairs without any opening gap penalty but with −2 penalty score for the extension gap. Blocks substitution matrix 62 (BLOSUM62) was considered as scoring matrix.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Primary structure similarity score: Smith-Waterman sequence alignment [ 45 ] was performed on all 21756 sequence pairs without any opening gap penalty but with −2 penalty score for the extension gap. Blocks substitution matrix 62 (BLOSUM62) was considered as scoring matrix.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They produce huge amounts of genetic data that require fast analysis in various phases of molecular profiling, medical diagnostics, and treatment of patients that suffer from serious diseases. However, although very useful, these methods additionally increase the huge gap between the number of known genetic sequences (DNA sequences), protein sequences [38,61,79] (which are encoded by genes in DNA, see Fig. 1), and 3D protein structures [36,52].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%