2017
DOI: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the Performance of Anthropometry Measurements in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

Abstract: Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…HC is used in children less than 24 months old as a marker of brain development and growth; we found a 36% prevalence of HC/A z score of less than –2. Unfortunately, the measurement of HC is often overlooked; in one PICU quality improvement study, 2012–2016, the authors were only able to achieve 19% compliance in admission measurements (18). Historically, several perceived barriers to obtaining anthropometry measurements in the PICU have been described (19).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HC is used in children less than 24 months old as a marker of brain development and growth; we found a 36% prevalence of HC/A z score of less than –2. Unfortunately, the measurement of HC is often overlooked; in one PICU quality improvement study, 2012–2016, the authors were only able to achieve 19% compliance in admission measurements (18). Historically, several perceived barriers to obtaining anthropometry measurements in the PICU have been described (19).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, nursing training programs in the pediatric ICU increased weight by 5% to 9%, height by 8% to 67%, and BMI by 9% to 59%. 19,23 Implementing a malnutrition-screening tool that utilizes anthropometric measurements increased weight measurement by 3% and height measurement by 58%. 21 EHR reminders increased BMI measurement rates by 9%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the difficulty of using BMI to distinguish between fat and muscle mass, as well as the effect of fluid imbalances and linear development anomalies, restricts its use as a malnutrition indicator ( 31 , 51 , 52 ). Arm anthropometry, such as mid-upper arm circumference or calf circumference, has been demonstrated to be a rapid, effective measure that may be better at representing body composition than BMI ( 53 , 54 ), and is an alternative nutritional evaluation to investigate for future research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%