Dynamic Systems and Control 1998
DOI: 10.1115/imece1998-0311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the Performance of a Geophone Through Capacitive Position Sensing and Feedback

Abstract: This paper reports on the improved performance of a geo-phone obtained by measuring the displacement of its proof mass capacitively rather than inductively and operating the sensor as a closed loop system. A measurement of the displacement of the proof mass rather than the velocity measurement made with a conventional geophone provides better low frequency performance. As a result, a geophone can be considered for use in a broader array of applications. A capacitive geophone can operate in either an open loop … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, variations in the excitation signals highlighted the non-linear behavior of the RS3D, with lower values of the FRF obtained with higher rms input velocity and differences as large as 0.6 dB observed in the −3 dB band. We think that this behavior is due to the mechanical characteristics of spring-mass system of the passive geophone sensor, as stated previously and in other studies (Barzilai et al, 1998;Oome et al, 2009;Stoll, 2015). On the contrary, the NT20s reveal nearly flat FRFs in the tested bandwidth for all the excitation amplitude levels (Figure 4b), in accordance with the specifications that indicate high-frequency response within 1 dB of nominal up to 45 Hz.…”
Section: Laboratory Testssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Second, variations in the excitation signals highlighted the non-linear behavior of the RS3D, with lower values of the FRF obtained with higher rms input velocity and differences as large as 0.6 dB observed in the −3 dB band. We think that this behavior is due to the mechanical characteristics of spring-mass system of the passive geophone sensor, as stated previously and in other studies (Barzilai et al, 1998;Oome et al, 2009;Stoll, 2015). On the contrary, the NT20s reveal nearly flat FRFs in the tested bandwidth for all the excitation amplitude levels (Figure 4b), in accordance with the specifications that indicate high-frequency response within 1 dB of nominal up to 45 Hz.…”
Section: Laboratory Testssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…On the other hand, if the vibration of the geophone can be directly measured using the proposed interferometry technique, a more detailed vibration measurement at the sensor without a power supply can be realized in comparison with that achieved in the previous study, in which the displacement in the spring-suspended mass vibration in the geophone was measured as a change in capacitance by using the electric signal. 35,36) By using the phase-shifted optical pulse interferometry proposed in this paper, the signal levels of reference light, R, measurement light, S, and interference light, I, can be simultaneously measured to remove the loss in the light-signal path, enabling application in long-distance transmission. Furthermore, by delaying the light-receiving interval of the pulse for each sensor, multiple channel measurements by the same pulse become possible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Efforts have been made to physically extend the measurement bandwidth of geophones. Pazos et al [ 23 ] employed a capacitor in series with the shunt resistance, Oome et al [ 24 ] applied a passive magnetic spring, and Barzilai et al [ 25 ] operated the geophone as a closed-loop system. Beker et al [ 26 , 27 , 28 ] employed sensor fusion strategies to construct a superior sensor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%