Improving the perception of respect for and the dignity of inpatients: a systematic review

Abstract

ObjectivesThe aim of this systematic review is to find evidence to determine which strategies are effective for improving hospitalised patients’ perception of respect and dignity.MethodsA systematic review of the literature was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines. The MEDLINE/PubMed, PsycINFO and Cochrane Library databases were searched on 9 March 2021. Observational studies, prospective studies, retrospective studies, controlled trials and randomised controlled trials with interventions focused on improving respect for patients and maintaining their dignity were included. Case reports, editorials, opinion articles, studies <10 subjects, responses/replies to authors, responses/replies to editors and review articles were excluded. The study population included inpatients at any health facility. Two evaluators assessed risk of bias according to the Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Reviews of Interventions criteria: allocation, randomisation, blinding and internal validity. The reviewers were blinded during the selection of studies as well as during the quality appraisal. Disagreements were resolved by consensus.Results2515 articles were retrieved from databases and 44 articles were included in this review. We conducted a quality appraisal of the studies (27 qualitative studies, 14 cross-sectional studies, 1 cohort study, 1 quali-quantitative study and 1 convergent parallel mixed-method study).DiscussionA limitation of this study is that it may not be generalisable to all cultures. Most of the included studies are of good quality according to the quality appraisal. To improve medical and hospital care in most countries, it is necessary to improve the training of doctors and other health professionals.ConclusionMany strategies could improve the perception of respect for and the dignity of the inpatient. The lack of interventional studies in this field has led to a gap in knowledge to be filled with better designed studies and effect measurements.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42021241805.

Ethical care in patients with Covid-19: A grounded theory

“…As stated in the findings section, in addition to the degree of faith affecting the severity of nurses’ sense of commitment, different environmental conditions also affect how and how much nurses do what they believe is right. The existence of inhibiting environmental conditions in the current study, such as the lack of equipment and nurses, along with cumbersome and sometimes inconsistent rules, which have also been stated in various studies, caused dissatisfaction and ethical tension among nurses [ 24 , 25 ]. In this regard, McGuire described the challenges and ethical conflicts in the American society during the Covid-19 pandemic.…”

Magnitude and Associated Factors of Dignity Preservation Among Hospitalized Patients, Mwanza Region Northwestern Tanzania. A cross sectional study

“…But in other country such as Ethiopia, almost 76% patients were aware about their rights (11). Dignity has been recognized as a fundamental basis in medical practices, healthcare providers are professionally accountable for preservation, promotion and provisions of dignity in their daily clinical care (13).…”

Dignity promotion in people with advanced chronic diseases: contributions for a value-based healthcare practice

“…Protect and promote patient autonomy by respecting their needs, preferences, alternatives, beliefs/values, privacy, and advocating against stigma (25,40).…”