2007
DOI: 10.1007/s00419-007-0129-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the neural network method for finite element model updating using homogenous distribution of design points

Abstract: In developing a neural network technique for a finite element model updating, researchers have been shown that the number of training samples and their quality, significantly affect the accuracy of the NN predication. In this study, based on the genetic algorithm (GA) method, we reduce the number of analyses required to develop the training pairs and reduce the amount of time for training the NN. In the other words, a uniform distribution of design points inside the design space will be obtained by means of th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, most of the soil sample data, used to train BPNN and PSO-BPNN, had low contents of the soil heavy metals. This led to larger errors for the test samples that had high heavy metal contents and affected performance and prediction accuracy [32]. Thus, in order to improve the prediction accuracy of the soil heavy metal contents, more soil samples with high values of the contents have to be collected to improve the performance of PSO-BPNN in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, most of the soil sample data, used to train BPNN and PSO-BPNN, had low contents of the soil heavy metals. This led to larger errors for the test samples that had high heavy metal contents and affected performance and prediction accuracy [32]. Thus, in order to improve the prediction accuracy of the soil heavy metal contents, more soil samples with high values of the contents have to be collected to improve the performance of PSO-BPNN in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their suggested updating approach is evaluated on a basic simulated model in the absence and presence of noise and after updating gets an accurate result. Sadr et al [19] conducted the experimental analysis on the structure and compare it with an analytical model by using the updating method. The authors introduced the neural network method to update the structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The non-model-based methods mainly include methods based on the change in natural frequency (Lee and Chung, 2000;Kim et al, 2003), the change of structural vibration mode (Khoo et al, 2004), the change of structural flexibility or stiffness (Yan and Golinval, 2005), the transfer function (Park and Park, 2005), the statistic information (Iwasaki et al, 2004;López-Díez et al, 2005;Garcia-Perez et al, 2013), the power flow (Li et al, 2004), and so on. The model-based methods detect damage based on predetermined structural models, in which the model updating methods are widely used (Sinha and Friswell, 2003;Sadr et al, 2007;Zhao et al, 2009;Lei et al, 2012;Liu and Duan, 2012;Erdogan and Bakir, 2013;Liu et al, 2013). However, most of the above methods are not quick, which means they provide structural information with an obvious time delay caused by their massive and off-line calculation process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%