2015
DOI: 10.1002/qj.2670
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the Laplace transform integration method

Abstract: We consider the Laplace transform filtering integration scheme applied to the shallow‐water equations, and demonstrate how it can be formulated as a finite‐difference scheme in the time domain. In addition, we investigate a more accurate treatment of the nonlinear terms. The advantages of the resulting algorithms are demonstrated by means of numerical integrations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, its low phase errors in the triadic test cases are a reflection of its exact representation of the linear terms. As well as any exponential time-differencing scheme that has no linear, dispersive errors, other methods such as a Laplace integrator, which can use a larger time-step of a semi-implicit method (Lynch & Clancy, 2016), are of interest. Future work will consider other time-steppers that can use the accuracy of the explicit methods beyond the linear stability limits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, its low phase errors in the triadic test cases are a reflection of its exact representation of the linear terms. As well as any exponential time-differencing scheme that has no linear, dispersive errors, other methods such as a Laplace integrator, which can use a larger time-step of a semi-implicit method (Lynch & Clancy, 2016), are of interest. Future work will consider other time-steppers that can use the accuracy of the explicit methods beyond the linear stability limits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LT scheme filters high frequency components by using a modified inversion operator L * : this can be done numerically by distorting the Bromwich contour for the inversion integral to a closed curve excluding poles associated with the high frequencies, as in [2,3,17,18,28]. In the persent study, as in those of Lynch and Clancy [20] and Harney and Lynch [12], we invert the transform analytically, explicitly eliminating components with frequency greater than a specified cut-off frequency ω c .…”
Section: Filtering With the Lt Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was pointed out in Lynch & Clancy [20] that the Laplace transform (LT) method with analytic inversion gives an exact treatment of the linear modes. This is due to the fact that the LT scheme does not involve time-averaging of the linear terms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this article, as in Lynch and Clancy (), we invert the transform analytically, explicitly eliminating components with frequency greater than a specified cut‐off frequency ω c . This may be done with a sharp cut‐off at ω c , or with a smooth function such as a Butterworth filter having frequency response function scriptHfalse(ωfalse)=11+false(ωfalse/ωnormalcfalse)L0.1em. …”
Section: Filtering With the Lt Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the above schemes used a numerical inversion of the Laplace transform. Lynch and Clancy (2016) showed that, with an appropriate formulation of the equations, the inversion could be performed analytically. This greatly enhanced the computational efficiency of the LT scheme, making it competitive with the SI method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%