2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-35888-4_53
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the Interaction of Older Adults with a Socially Assistive Table Setting Robot

Abstract: This study provides user-studies aimed at exploring factors influencing the interaction between older adults and a robotic table setting assistant. The influence of level of automation (LOA) and level of transparency (LOT) on the quality of the interaction was considered. Results revealed that the interaction effect of LOA and LOT significantly influenced the interaction. A lower LOA which required the user to control some of the actions of the robot influenced the older adults to participate more in the inter… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ongoing research is aimed at performing studies with older adults for daily living tasks and for nonprofessional users, putting into consideration the influence of demographics on the changes automation brings [64]. LOA has proven to influence performance for older adults [12]. We expect the effect of the levels of workload to amplify with them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ongoing research is aimed at performing studies with older adults for daily living tasks and for nonprofessional users, putting into consideration the influence of demographics on the changes automation brings [64]. LOA has proven to influence performance for older adults [12]. We expect the effect of the levels of workload to amplify with them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The level of automation (LOA) of the system, defined as the degree to which the robot and the human are involved in the collaborative task [8][9][10][11], influences the characteristics of the dynamics of the collaboration, the behavior of the robots, actions to be taken, as well as autonomy of the human in the collaboration [12,13]. Workload addresses the actual and perceived amount of work that the human operator experiences as related to the effort invested in the task [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for this might be connected with the frustration experienced by the participants in the higher task complexity when the automation failed or did not perform as expected (as seen in the frustration dimension of the NASA-TLX). In these situations, participants switched to lower automation (as was possible in the adjustable-high LOA condition), perhaps to facilitate easier handling of some of these challenges as noted in [29] where a lower LOA was found to better facilitate easier interaction. The switching, however, incurs some switch costs [22,52] which could have contributed to the frustration observed in the high LOA mode.…”
Section: Impact Of Loa In Mrp Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for this might be connected with the frustration experienced by the participants in the higher task complexity when the automation failed or did not perform as expected (as seen in the frustration dimension of the NASA-TLX). In these situations, participants switched to a lower automation, perhaps to facilitate easier handling of some of these challenges as noted in [48] where a lower LOA was found to better facilitate easier interaction. The switching however incurs some switch costs [49], [29] which could have contributed to the frustration observed in the high LOA mode.…”
Section: A Impact Of Loa In Mrp Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%