2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.107785
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the galloping energy harvesting performance with magnetic coupling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the distance increases, the magnetic force decreases, and the growth of the restoring force of the piezoelectric beam stabilizes. When the magnetically attached GEHs move inside the first outer magnet, the function w(t) follows a cubic polynomial, which is consistent with the literature [38]. When the magnetically attached GEHs move outside the first outer magnet, the trend of F r (w(t)) in relation to w(t) is comparatively complex and can be well fitted by a fifth-degree or seventh-degree polynomial.…”
Section: Experiments Setup and Model Designsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As the distance increases, the magnetic force decreases, and the growth of the restoring force of the piezoelectric beam stabilizes. When the magnetically attached GEHs move inside the first outer magnet, the function w(t) follows a cubic polynomial, which is consistent with the literature [38]. When the magnetically attached GEHs move outside the first outer magnet, the trend of F r (w(t)) in relation to w(t) is comparatively complex and can be well fitted by a fifth-degree or seventh-degree polynomial.…”
Section: Experiments Setup and Model Designsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…As shown in the figures 5(a) and (b), due to the segmentation of the piezoelectric beam's restoring force function, A-GEH exhibits a flatter potential well inside the magnet distance compared to A&R-GEH, whereas A&R-GEH displays a flatter potential curve outside the magnet distance compared to A-GEH. Studies indicate that a flatter and deeper potential well might be more favorable for energy harvesting [38].…”
Section: Experiments Setup and Model Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…( 33) that the nonlinear coefficients k 1 and k 3 affect the response frequency of the system. From the previous researches [38,41], it is known that k 1 is negative and k 3 is positive. Thus, k 1 reduces the stiffness of the system and k 3 increases it.…”
Section: Power Performance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the first vibration mode plays an overwhelming effect in the response of the cantilever beam with a tip mass, the only first mode can be considered in the modeling of a FIV energy harvester [39]. Substituting the single mode into the expressions of kinetic energy, potential energy and non-conservative work, and the governing equation can be obtained by using the following Euler-Lagrange equation d dt…”
Section: Design and Theoretical Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%