2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cois.2015.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the future of honey bee breeding programs by employing recent scientific advances

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, the number of drones required for insemination of one queen is larger (Czekońska et al, 2013(Czekońska et al, , 2015Czekońska et al, 2015). It is sometimes suggested that drone quality should be considered in breeding programmes (Niño & Jasper, 2015). In particular, it was suggested that viability and motility of spermatozoa should be used as a selection criteria (Rhodes, 2008), but the assessment of these parameters is relatively difficult.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the number of drones required for insemination of one queen is larger (Czekońska et al, 2013(Czekońska et al, , 2015Czekońska et al, 2015). It is sometimes suggested that drone quality should be considered in breeding programmes (Niño & Jasper, 2015). In particular, it was suggested that viability and motility of spermatozoa should be used as a selection criteria (Rhodes, 2008), but the assessment of these parameters is relatively difficult.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the beginnings of beekeeping, honey bees were not "bred" so much as "kept": humans provided rudimentary containers (often destroyed during honey harvesting) and hoped that wild bee colonies would take up residence without later swarming [105]. Over time, humans increased their control on bees by developing swarming control device (i.e., queen excluder [96]), reproduction control (e.g., artificial insemination [97]), mass breeding (e.g., [107]), selective breeding programs (e.g., [108][109][110]), and new strains (e.g., Buckfast strain [111] or Africanized honey bees [112]).…”
Section: Domestication History Traits and Pathway Of Apis Melliferamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, there is no control by humans over the life cycle of wild populations that are commonly observed for the African group [126][127][128]. In contrast, many populations belonging to the European groups have a life cycle completed in man-made environment (i.e., hives) and controlled by humans (i.e., control of superorganism reproduction), feed on domesticated crops (i.e., humans can actively control the honey bee food supply for honey production or crop pollination) and/or on artificial food provided by humans (i.e., sugar syrup) [129], and some of them undergo selective breeding programs [108][109][110][111]. Therefore, the domestication levels of A. mellifera range from 0 to 5 according to the population considered.…”
Section: Is Apis Mellifera Domesticated?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means the variety or variant of the size of the stomach, gonads, heart, intestine, and others was an expression of the genetic variation that controls and produces it of the three variants or genetic variants of the additive variant, the dominant variant and the epistatic variant, only variants or additive variants could be transmitted in predictable and reliable ways, since the variety of additives was the function of allele, while the dominant variety was a genotype function that was the interaction between an inter alella at each locus [116][117][118][119]. So that additive diversity was sometimes regarded as a determinant factor in the breeding values of an individual.…”
Section: Selection and Breeding Programmentioning
confidence: 99%