2023
DOI: 10.1111/add.16358
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the epidemiology of low‐risk drinking guidelines is not enough

Michael Livingston
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We would like to thank Mr Angus and Drs Livingston, Holmes and Greenfield for their commentaries on our debate article [1][2][3][4]. These commentaries focus upon (i) the definition, operationalization and communication of health consequences from alcohol use and (ii) the need to communicate how per occasion drinking impacts health.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We would like to thank Mr Angus and Drs Livingston, Holmes and Greenfield for their commentaries on our debate article [1][2][3][4]. These commentaries focus upon (i) the definition, operationalization and communication of health consequences from alcohol use and (ii) the need to communicate how per occasion drinking impacts health.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…
There is a need for research on how the use of years of life lost and risk zones affect risk perception, and how risk acceptability differs between individuals. Furthermore, there is a need for guidance documents to better delineate how single-occasion drinking increases harms.We would like to thank Mr Angus and Drs Livingston, Holmes and Greenfield for their commentaries on our debate article [1][2][3][4]. These commentaries focus upon (i) the definition, operationalization and communication of health consequences from alcohol use and (ii) the need to communicate how per occasion drinking impacts health.
…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inherent limits of low-risk thresholds are quite obvious and should be acknowledged – certainly so when used in a healthcare setting. Here, we are not only thinking about the fact that guideline panels make quite arbitrary cut-offs on smooth risk curves ( Room & Rehm, 2012 ), or that the 1‰ or 1% risk levels are far from given ( Livingston, 2023 ). We, as others, also believe that any guideline should allow people to make decisions based on their own risk tolerance ( Livingston, 2023 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we are not only thinking about the fact that guideline panels make quite arbitrary cut-offs on smooth risk curves ( Room & Rehm, 2012 ), or that the 1‰ or 1% risk levels are far from given ( Livingston, 2023 ). We, as others, also believe that any guideline should allow people to make decisions based on their own risk tolerance ( Livingston, 2023 ). This issue is important for healthcare staff to understand in order to avoid blanket recommendations that patients might find non-credible or even misplaced.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%