Seasonal changes in photosynthesis of apple trees (Malus domestica Borkh.) were monitored to examine the effect of source-sink interactions on photosynthesis and photorespiration. Elevated photosynthetic rates were observed during two periods of the growing season and correlated with the fruiting process. The first period of increased photosynthetic rates was during the bloom period, when spur leaves on flowering shoots exhibited up to 25% higher photosynthetic rates than vegetative spur leaves on a leaf area basis. CO2 assimilation rates were also higher in fruiting trees than nonfruiting trees during the period of rapid fruit growth from July to September. Photorespiration, dark respiration, leaf resistance, and transpiration exhibited no seasonal changes which correlated to the presence or absence of fruit. These data represent the first comprehensive examination of the effects of flowering/fruit formation on photosynthesis and photorespiration in perennial plants.Regulation of photosynthesis by fruit growth occurs in many plants, with photosynthetic promotion or reduction depending on sink demand. Other studies, however, have shown no correlation between photosynthetic rates and sink strength (cf 7). In apple (Malus domestica Borkh.), fruiting trees were shown to have reduced leaf weights (25) and leaf areas (1), but more total dry matter than nonfruiting trees (12), suggesting greater photosynthetic efficiency. In other studies, fixation of '4CO2 was usually greatest in leaves nearest the fruit, although sometimes the second nearest or even fruits further away received much of the labeled assimilates (10). Kazaryan et al. (18) also found the highest photosynthetic activity in leaves attached directly to the base of the apple pedicel and lower photosynthetic rates in leaves of nonfruiting branches of the same age. Wardlaw (29) noted that developing apple fruits always seemed to have priority demand over assimilates from adjacent leaves, whereas flowers and small or mature fruit had no effect on photosynthetic rates and attracted very little assimilates (4). From mid-June, the fruits in apple become strong sinks and may absorb nearly all assimilates from leaves on the same short shoot (spur). This suggests a pronounced fruit effect on photosynthesis during the period of intensive fruit growth (9,13 creases in apple due to the presence of fruit have not been consistent and have ranged from 40 to 400% (2,3,11,23).In general, changes in the components of net photosynthesis in fruiting trees are not well studied. In Citrus madurensis, dark respiration in fruiting and nonfruiting plants was similar (19), while Avery and Moore (3) found fruiting apple trees had lower dark respiration than nonfruiting trees, along with the lower stomatal and mesophyll resistances and increased transpiration rates. Others also recorded lower stomatal resistance (26) and higher transpiration rates (12) in fruiting apple trees.Photorespiration occurs three to five times faster than dark respiration in C3 plants and is a major ...