2017
DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2017.28.209.10466
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the efficiency and standards of a National Immunization Program Review: lessons learnt from United Republic of Tanzania

Abstract: A National Immunization Program Review (NIP Review) is a comprehensive external assessment of the performance of a country’s immunization programme. The number of recommended special-topic NIP assessments, such as those for vaccine introduction or vaccine management, has increased. These assessments often have substantial overlap with NIP reviews, raising concern about duplication. Innovative technical and management approaches, including integrating several assessments into one, were applied in the United Rep… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To overcome the above-mentioned challenges with paper-based approach, there has been an attempt to use data collection applications on smartphones and tablets in the conduct of EPI Review in Tanzania in the year 2015. This attempt met with challenges, which include, time to translate the tools into mobile application, difficulty in transmitting data due to poor internet services, and timing for training 6 . The use of such technology is not only limited to surveys but has been used in various clinical settings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome the above-mentioned challenges with paper-based approach, there has been an attempt to use data collection applications on smartphones and tablets in the conduct of EPI Review in Tanzania in the year 2015. This attempt met with challenges, which include, time to translate the tools into mobile application, difficulty in transmitting data due to poor internet services, and timing for training 6 . The use of such technology is not only limited to surveys but has been used in various clinical settings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These program reviews, conducted every 4 to 5 years, constitute a holistic assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of the immunisation program at national, sub-national and service-delivery levels. The reviews are done with the participation of various technical partners and provide the evidence to align the immunisation program´s strategic directions and priority activities which are then translated into comprehensive Multi Year Plans (cMYP), and subsequent annual program plans, and as advocacy tools to reinforce the engagement of the leadership within the respective Ministries of Health [ 9 , 10 ]. Countries supported with Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunisation (GAVI) funding undertake annual joint appraisal exercises with a focus on grant monitoring and overall progress towards program goals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Countries supported with GAVI funding undertake annual joint appraisal exercises with a focus on grant monitoring and overall progress towards program goals. These appraisals do not substitute for comprehensive program reviews [ 10 ]. The Eastern and Southern African subregion of the WHO consists of 20 Member States, a subset of the 47-member State of the WHO African region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%