Improving the Effectiveness of Mobile Application Design: User-Pairs Testing by Non-professionals

Abstract

Abstract. The nature of mobile applications requires a fast and inexpensive design process. The development phase is short because the life cycle of an application is limited, mobile technology is developing rapidly, and the competition is heavy. Existing design methods are time-consuming and require expertise (e.g. Contextual Design). We suggest a design approach where focus groups are followed by usability tests in pairs carried out by non-professional moderators. With this approach CHI departments can benefit from market research resources, and improve collaboration with marketing people. We evaluated this approach with a case called News Client. The findings show that in paired-user tests near half of the usability problems were found compared to individual usability testing. The results are not too profound but enough for industry needs. Another interesting point is that our findings do not support the earlier reported results according to which the interaction between two participants can bring out more input than a single participant thinking aloud.

A Usability Checklist for the Usability Evaluation of Mobile Phone User Interface

“…Major mobile companies such as Nokia are already trying to develop and apply UI design guidelines to the actual design process of mobile phones. However, the development phase of mobile phones is relatively short compared with consumer appliances, due to the limited life cycle of the mobile devices, rapid change in mobile technology, and the extensively com-petitive market (Kallio & Kekalainen, 2004). Hence, there is certainly a great demand in the mobile industry to develop and implement "light" design approaches or evaluation techniques, which can be applied with time constraints and minimal efforts (Kallio & Kekalainen, 2004).…”

Evaluation tools through user participation techniques: Features, limitations, and new perspectives

“…Thus, the life cycle is limited considering the rapid change in technology and the competitive market. Then, the evaluator is faced with low time constraints and minimal effort to proceed to the evaluation [34].…”