2015
DOI: 10.1177/0333102415583982
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the detection of chronic migraine: Development and validation of Identify Chronic Migraine (ID-CM)

Abstract: BackgroundMigraine, particularly chronic migraine (CM), is underdiagnosed and undertreated worldwide. Our objective was to develop and validate a self-administered tool (ID-CM) to identify migraine and CM.MethodsID-CM was developed in four stages. (1) Expert clinicians suggested candidate items from existing instruments and experience (Delphi Panel method). (2) Candidate items were reviewed by people with CM during cognitive debriefing interviews. (3) Items were administered to a Web panel of people with sever… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
64
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 A questionnaire which considers a number of the clinical features of chronic migraine and which can be completed by the patient prior to the physician visit has also been developed. 5 Patients may access, complete and print this chronic migraine screening tool at the Allergan-sponsored website. 6 It is not a diagnostic tool, but is meant to alert the patient and the physician that the patient may have chronic migraine.…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 A questionnaire which considers a number of the clinical features of chronic migraine and which can be completed by the patient prior to the physician visit has also been developed. 5 Patients may access, complete and print this chronic migraine screening tool at the Allergan-sponsored website. 6 It is not a diagnostic tool, but is meant to alert the patient and the physician that the patient may have chronic migraine.…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[39][40][41][42] These instruments can assist in making diagnoses, track levels of treatment optimization, and aid clinicians in improving treatment by pinpointing specific areas of need. [39][40][41][42] These instruments can assist in making diagnoses, track levels of treatment optimization, and aid clinicians in improving treatment by pinpointing specific areas of need.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, making use of validated clinical tools developed to aid in the assessment, diagnosis, and effective treatment of migraine and CM, including ID Migraine TM , ID Chronic Migraine (ID-CM), the Migraine Treatment Optimization Questionnaire (mTOQ-6), the Headache Under-Response to Treatment (HURT) Index, and the Migraine Assessment of Current Therapy (Migraine ACT), to monitor treatment optimization among patients can help bridge the gaps identified in the dialogues. [39][40][41][42] These instruments can assist in making diagnoses, track levels of treatment optimization, and aid clinicians in improving treatment by pinpointing specific areas of need. In the case of the mTOQ-6, deficits in the various domains may suggest specific actions including using CM-specific therapies, adding preventive pharmacologic interventions, and adding empirically supported behavioral interventions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the diagnosis of CM and CTTH, we diagnosed CM and CTTH based on the headache history during the previous year according to ICHD‐III beta . CM is a disease that is often delayed in diagnosis or treatment, so it is very common to see a history of headache for more than 1 year in first‐visit patients with headache . We tried to recruit all eligible CM or CTTH patients who firstly visited our clinics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 CM is a disease that is often delayed in diagnosis or treatment, so it is very common to see a history of headache for more than 1 year in firstvisit patients with headache. 3 We tried to recruit all eligible CM or CTTH patients who firstly visited our clinics. Nevertheless, we did not collect data for total potential eligible patients and those who declined to participate in our study.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%