2019
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3358756
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the Classification Accuracy of Accurate Traffic Sign Detection and Recognition System Using HOG and LBP Features and PCA-Based Dimension Reduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other methods, like HOG, utilized gradient-based image features to represent traffic signs [11]. These handcrafted features were then fed into classifiers such as support vector machines or decision trees for recognition [23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Traditional Traffic Sign Recognition Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other methods, like HOG, utilized gradient-based image features to represent traffic signs [11]. These handcrafted features were then fed into classifiers such as support vector machines or decision trees for recognition [23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Traditional Traffic Sign Recognition Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another study by Soni et al, (2019) [2] used HOG and LBP descriptors with the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Support Vector Machines (SVM) to classify traffic signs. The study used the Chinese Traffic Sign Database (TSRD) with 58 classes and 6164 images, and the best performing method was the LBP with the PCA and SVM classifiers, achieving an accuracy level of 84.44%.…”
Section: Machine Learning For Traffic Sign Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feature extractors and supervised classifiers have been arranged differently to minimize misclassifications in a wide variety of domains. Soni et al [ 24 ] processed the Chinese traffic sign dataset through SVM, trained on the HOG or LBP after Principal Component Analysis (PCA), reaching an accuracy of 84.44%. A similar setup was used by Manisha and Liyanage [ 21 ], who achieved 98.6% accuracy on vehicles moving at 40–45 km/h.…”
Section: Background On Traffic Sign Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Throughout the years, many studies tackled TSR [ 21 , 22 , 23 ] using different feature descriptors and ML-based classifiers. Different combinations of such classifiers and features have been proven to generate heterogeneous classification scores [ 15 , 19 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 ] motivating the need for comparisons to discover the optimal classifier for a given TSR problem [ 3 , 28 , 29 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%