2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2020.05.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the Accuracy of Protein Thermostability Predictions for Single Point Mutations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
79
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
1
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…FoldX and etc. It often precisely predicts the free energy differences between the mutations with a RMSE of about only1.2 kcal/mol [7][8]. It has been also shown that the better sampling approaches lead to much better results and most importantly for more than 90% correct predictions of the effect; i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…FoldX and etc. It often precisely predicts the free energy differences between the mutations with a RMSE of about only1.2 kcal/mol [7][8]. It has been also shown that the better sampling approaches lead to much better results and most importantly for more than 90% correct predictions of the effect; i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the computational demands, the Free energy of binding (FEP) approach is one of the most successful and precise in silico techniques for accurate prediction of both the ligand selectivity [6][7], protein-protein interactions [8][9] and protein stability [10][11]. It outperforms significantly the traditional molecular dynamics based methodologies, such as for example MM/GBSA and empirical solutions like FoldX and etc.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We carried out FEP calculations to calculate the changes of binding affinity between the Streptomyces griseus proteinases B (SGPB) and the turkey ovomucoid third domain (OMTKY3) caused by single mutations 65 . This protein-protein complex has been used to validate the accuracy of FEP calculations in several previous studies 64,66 . FEP calculations were conducted on five selected mutations, which display changes in binding affinity ranging from 3.0 to 8.5 kcal/mol.…”
Section: Rbfe Performance Benchmark For Protein Mutationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proteins being dynamic molecules, substitution mutations impact molecular motions leading to a change in the flexible conformations and vibrational entropy. Most of the tools that predict thermodynamic stability changes assess the change in a static state [15] . Employing molecular dynamics simulations and normal mode analysis aid accurate assessment of stability changes [16] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%