2019
DOI: 10.4155/fmc-2018-0207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the Accuracy of Predicting protein–ligand binding-free Energy With Semiempirical Quantum Chemistry Charge

Abstract: Many theoretical methods for studying protein-ligand interaction share a common challenge to accurately calculate the binding-free energy ( G) between protein and ligand, which impedes their reliability and wide application [1][2][3][4]. Strategies of calculating ligand-binding affinities have therefore received increasing attention over decades. For

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The approach 2 (Figure 3c, SIE‐SQMPC) is a combination of the SIE and SQMPC charges. The SIE approach is a parametrized scoring function to estimate Δ G based on MD simulation trajectory, of which the parameters used were kept the same with our previous study 18 . The R 2 of the approach 2 is 0.54.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The approach 2 (Figure 3c, SIE‐SQMPC) is a combination of the SIE and SQMPC charges. The SIE approach is a parametrized scoring function to estimate Δ G based on MD simulation trajectory, of which the parameters used were kept the same with our previous study 18 . The R 2 of the approach 2 is 0.54.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Delphi program 51 is used to calculate surface charges as the background charges of each SQM/MM system. In this work, PM7 SQM method 52 was used in SQMPC approach, according to our previous investigations of 50 ligand–protein systems 18 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations