2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2021.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving surgical outcome with electric source imaging and high field magnetic resonance imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 135 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in an actual clinical setting, the epileptic focus needs to be localized before introducing the DREADDs. The accuracy of focus localization has been largely improved by combining imaging/electrophysiological methods (e.g., MRI, FDG-PET, MEG, EEG, and ECoG) with current algorithms 36 , 37 . These points need further confirmation in future studies using NHP models of epilepsy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in an actual clinical setting, the epileptic focus needs to be localized before introducing the DREADDs. The accuracy of focus localization has been largely improved by combining imaging/electrophysiological methods (e.g., MRI, FDG-PET, MEG, EEG, and ECoG) with current algorithms 36 , 37 . These points need further confirmation in future studies using NHP models of epilepsy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical aspects range from updates on the first epileptic seizure presentation in children and adults, uncommon epileptic syndromes in childhood and new information on the complex relationship between neurocysticercosis, seizures and epilepsy [4][5][6]. The Brazilian group of Lutzky Saute et al demonstrate how the combination of high field magnetic imaging and with electric source imaging may improve the chances of achieving seizure freedom through the surgical treatment of MRI negative pharmacoresistant epilepsies [7].…”
Section: Celebrating the Lasse 15th Editionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Accurately determining the epileptogenicity of TEs can be challenging, as standard methods in the presurgical evaluation, such as scalp electroencephalography (EEG) and seizure semiology, may not provide sufficient spatial resolution. 4,5 Additionally, 16%-31% of TLE patients are considered nonlesional on routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), in contrast to the finding that temporal TEs are often identified in MRIs of patients who were previously reported as having normal results. 6 Although the temporal pole is a crucial site within temporal lobe seizure networks, 5,7 scalp EEG recordings can barely differentiate between the origins of interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) at the sublobar level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%