1993
DOI: 10.1007/bf00122136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving supervision of cooperative learning: A new approach to staff development for principals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite differences in measures of principal self-efficacy the available research indicates that principal self-efficacy is associated with principal well-being and motivation as well as adaptive leadership functioning. Principal self-efficacy has been shown to be positively associated with engagement (Federici and Skaalvik 2011), job satisfaction (Federici and Skaalvik 2012), persistence in pursuing goals (Osterman and Sullivan 1996), motivation for retaining in the principal position (Dimmock and Hattie 1996), the quality of supervision of teachers (Licklider and Niska 1993), collective teacher efficacy (Hallinger et al 2018), and effort to influence teacher attitudes and behaviors (see Hallinger et al 2018). Principal self-efficacy has also been shown to be negatively related to burnout and motivation to leave the principal position (Federici and Skaalvik 2012).…”
Section: Principal Self-efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite differences in measures of principal self-efficacy the available research indicates that principal self-efficacy is associated with principal well-being and motivation as well as adaptive leadership functioning. Principal self-efficacy has been shown to be positively associated with engagement (Federici and Skaalvik 2011), job satisfaction (Federici and Skaalvik 2012), persistence in pursuing goals (Osterman and Sullivan 1996), motivation for retaining in the principal position (Dimmock and Hattie 1996), the quality of supervision of teachers (Licklider and Niska 1993), collective teacher efficacy (Hallinger et al 2018), and effort to influence teacher attitudes and behaviors (see Hallinger et al 2018). Principal self-efficacy has also been shown to be negatively related to burnout and motivation to leave the principal position (Federici and Skaalvik 2012).…”
Section: Principal Self-efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, efficacious principals tend to be more persistent in pursuing goals and are more adaptable to changes (Osterman and Sullivan 1996). According to Licklider and Niska (1993), principals' self-efficacy is related to the quality of supervision of teachers (Licklider and Niska 1993). Principals' level of self-efficacy also influences their effort, work persistence and resilience in the face of setbacks (Tschannen-Moran and Gareis 2004).…”
Section: Principal Self-efficacy and Work Engagement: Assessing A Normentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the few studies that have been conducted into the self-efficacy of school principals, it appears that self-efficacy has an influence on (a) the efforts they make, (b) their perseverance in this and (c) the resilience to work-related problems (Federici and Skaalvik, 2011; Tschannen-Moran and Gareis, 2004). Furthermore, the self-efficacy of a school principal would also have an influence on the attitudes and performance of his or her team (Licklider and Niska, 1993). Self-efficacy of principals is negatively correlated with burnout of principals and positively correlated with their job satisfaction (Evers et al, 2002; Friedman, 1995, 2002; Skaalvik and Skaalvik, 2007, 2009).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%