2021
DOI: 10.1370/afm.2729
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Suicide Risk Screening to Identify the Highest Risk Patients: Results From the PRImary Care Screening Methods (PRISM) Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, some individuals might not experience traditionally defined “passive” and “active” suicidal thoughts, but may instead experiencing other types of negative thoughts that signal increased vulnerability to suicidal behavior, such as unbearability (e.g., I can not imagine anyone being able to withstand this kind of pain ) and self‐hatred (e.g., I am completely unworthy of love ). Such thoughts have been shown to prospectively predict suicidal behaviors even when accounting for suicidal ideation (Bryan et al, 2014, Bryan, May, et al, 2020; Bryan, Rozek, et al, 2020; Bryan, Allen, et al, in press). This suggestion is consistent with our broader finding that suicide risk does not always involve a linear progression of worsening suicidal thoughts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, some individuals might not experience traditionally defined “passive” and “active” suicidal thoughts, but may instead experiencing other types of negative thoughts that signal increased vulnerability to suicidal behavior, such as unbearability (e.g., I can not imagine anyone being able to withstand this kind of pain ) and self‐hatred (e.g., I am completely unworthy of love ). Such thoughts have been shown to prospectively predict suicidal behaviors even when accounting for suicidal ideation (Bryan et al, 2014, Bryan, May, et al, 2020; Bryan, Rozek, et al, 2020; Bryan, Allen, et al, in press). This suggestion is consistent with our broader finding that suicide risk does not always involve a linear progression of worsening suicidal thoughts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of clinical importance, our results suggest that suicide risk screening and assessment methods that focus on self-disclosure of thoughts about death and suicide may be well suited for identifying high risk states among non–gun owners but that these screening items are less likely to be endorsed by gun owners with the highest probability of suicide attempt. Evidence has shown that suicidal ideation has only modest sensitivity as an indicator of suicidal behavior, even when someone is screened within a few weeks of their suicide attempt . The present study’s results suggest that the modest sensitivity of suicidal ideation as an indicator of suicidal behavior may be explained in part by heterogeneous associations among various indicators of suicide risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 43%
“…Evidence has shown that suicidal ideation has only modest sensitivity as an indicator of suicidal behavior, even when someone is screened within a few weeks of their suicide attempt. 3,4,[34][35][36] The present study's results suggest that the modest sensitivity of suicidal ideation as an indicator of suicidal behavior may be explained in part by heterogeneous associations among various indicators of suicide risk. The findings suggest that supplementing passive and active suicidal ideation items with items assessing thoughts about specific ways or methods of attempting suicide and/or taking steps to prepare for a suicide attempt may improve detection of subgroups at high risk of suicide attempt.…”
Section: Jama Network Open | Psychiatrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Suicide Cognitions Scale-Revised (SCS-R) ( 25 ) is a 16-item self-report scale designed to measure maladaptive suicidogenic beliefs and perceptions commonly reported by suicidal patients (e.g., “I can't stand this pain anymore” and “Nothing can help solve my problems”). Items are rated using a 5-point scale, with higher scores indicating greater identification with negative self-perceptions and worldviews.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%