2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving students’ proportional thinking using schema-based instruction

Abstract: This study investigated the effectiveness of an instructional program (schema-based instruction, SBI) designed to teach 7 th graders how to comprehend and solve proportion problems involving ratios/rates, scale drawings, and percents. The SBI program emphasized the underlying mathematical structure of problems via schematic diagrams, focused on a 4-step procedure to support and monitor problem solving, and addressed the flexible use of alternative solution strategies based on the problem situation. Blocking by… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

7
67
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
7
67
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Researchers have long known that multiple representations have the potential to support learning and transfer (e.g., Ainsworth, 1999;Mayer, 2003;Scheiter et al, 2010;Sternberg, Toroff, & Grigorenko, 1998), particularly when accompanied by explicit prompts to compare those representations (Gick & Holyoak, 1983). Multiple representations not only encourage learners to extract the underlying structure of problems (Gick & Holyoak, 1983;Jitendra, Star, Rodriguez, Lindell, & Someki, 2011), but also support remembering because they prevent the learning environment from becoming too constant and predictable (Bjork & Bjork, 2011). In the present study, we tried to control for the number of representations by using a concrete condition that included three concrete instantiations that differed in surface form.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have long known that multiple representations have the potential to support learning and transfer (e.g., Ainsworth, 1999;Mayer, 2003;Scheiter et al, 2010;Sternberg, Toroff, & Grigorenko, 1998), particularly when accompanied by explicit prompts to compare those representations (Gick & Holyoak, 1983). Multiple representations not only encourage learners to extract the underlying structure of problems (Gick & Holyoak, 1983;Jitendra, Star, Rodriguez, Lindell, & Someki, 2011), but also support remembering because they prevent the learning environment from becoming too constant and predictable (Bjork & Bjork, 2011). In the present study, we tried to control for the number of representations by using a concrete condition that included three concrete instantiations that differed in surface form.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach teaches students to identify types of word problem and then use representations or schemas to help facilitate problem solving. For example, Jitendra and colleagues (, , , ) used Schema‐Based Instruction to teach students problem identification, thereby facilitating overall problem comprehension.…”
Section: Mathematics Problem‐solving Intervention Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considerable research in mathematics education has focused on how to improve students' proportional reasoning (e.g., Behr, Harel, Post, & Lesh, 1992;Lamon, 2007;Lesh, Post, & Behr, 1988;Litwiller & Bright, 2002), with recommendations that include providing ratio and proportion tasks in a wide range of contexts (e.g., measurements, prices, rates) and ensuring that students have experienced conceptual instruction before presenting symbolic strategies for solving proportional problems. Accordingly, the purpose of the present randomized controlled study was to rigorously evaluate the effectiveness of one instructional intervention, schema-based instruction (SBI), which has shown promise in prior work in enhancing students' ability to solve problems with embedded ratio, proportion, and percent concepts (e.g., Jitendra, Star, Starosta, Leh, Sood, & Caskie, 2009;Jitendra, Star, Rodriguez, Lindell, & Someki, 2011). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%