2016
DOI: 10.1111/jabr.12083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving stress reduction and wellness in interdisciplinary chronic pain management: Is transdisciplinary care a better option?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarities and differences between these approaches are described in detail elsewhere [7]. Although both rely on the BPS model, they differ regarding whether the goals of the professionals are integrated, whether professionals work collaboratively in teams, and whether their treatments are provided simultaneously or sequentially [9,15]. The interdisciplinary treatment, which is based on the BPS approach [1], is the standard treatment used in IPRPs.…”
Section: Basic Contents Of Iprpmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarities and differences between these approaches are described in detail elsewhere [7]. Although both rely on the BPS model, they differ regarding whether the goals of the professionals are integrated, whether professionals work collaboratively in teams, and whether their treatments are provided simultaneously or sequentially [9,15]. The interdisciplinary treatment, which is based on the BPS approach [1], is the standard treatment used in IPRPs.…”
Section: Basic Contents Of Iprpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both circumstances indicate a need for the development of IPRP so that IPRP better matches the clinical picture. For example, individual treatments, short interventions, small group activities with different content to be selected for individual patients, individual treatments with the team as a backup, and closer communication with primary care to ensure that recommendations can improve the lives of patients without going through extensive IPRPs, which might be more appropriate for the less severe subgroups [15]. In the long run, this could mean that different IPRPs are available in clinical settings.…”
Section: Shortcomings and Possible Improvements Of Iprpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although IPRP is an established treatment, it has recently been suggested that a more diverse range of rehabilitation approaches may be required to meet the growing needs of different pain populations (Gerdle et al, 2022). One such area of development is closer collaboration with primary care (McGeary et al, 2016). Another possible complement can be early interventions to prevent chronicity (Nicholas et al, 2020).…”
Section: Interdisciplinary Pain Rehabilitation Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%