2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation 2013
DOI: 10.1109/icra.2013.6631156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving sparse roadmap spanners

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This also is advantageous for the on-line algorithm. Note that this contrasts approaches of sparsification as a post-processing step as in Dobson and Bekris (2013), where exploration of the free space is more sought, and rejection checks are local. Thus, there is less penalty to creating large transitions systems.…”
Section: Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This also is advantageous for the on-line algorithm. Note that this contrasts approaches of sparsification as a post-processing step as in Dobson and Bekris (2013), where exploration of the free space is more sought, and rejection checks are local. Thus, there is less penalty to creating large transitions systems.…”
Section: Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, we impose that the states of the transition system be bounded away from each other (by a given function decaying in terms of the size of the transition system). Computing sparse structures is also explored by Dobson and Bekris (2013) for PRM using different techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has shown that better path quality solution can be provided for queries that are time-constrained. In an advanced version, SPARS2 [27], the near-optimally feature is preserved without the need for the dense graph to be developed. This allows for a considerable reduction in memory requirements and a production of high-quality path faster than the original version.…”
Section: Motion Planning Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each node of the graph is found by using a different state sampler (e.g., uniform, gauss, and obstacle based). We can find the PRM method [11][12][13], SPARS method [14][15][16], RRT method [13,[17][18][19][20], SBL method [21], EST method [22], KPIECE method [23], and SyCLOP method [24].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%