2018
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b00010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Solar Cell Performance Using Quantum Dot Triad Charge-Separation Engines

Abstract: We use kinetic modeling to explore the current–voltage, power–voltage, and power conversion efficiency characteristics of quantum dot dyads and triads as possible light absorption and charge separation engines in quantum dot, bulk heterojunction solar cells. The external and internal power conversion quantum efficiencies are significantly enhanced by introducing a third quantum dot between the donor and acceptor quantum dots. Given the constraint of comparable charge-recombination and charge-separation rates, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
(117 reference statements)
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The electron transfer rate from the smallest CdS QDs to Pt is comparable to typical rates from QDs to various acceptors including oxides, inorganic complexes, organic compounds and carbon allotropes. [3][4][5][6][7] More relevantly, a rate constant of 1.22 × 10 9 s -1 was found from 3.6 nm CdSe QDs to Pt, 17 which is close to that measured here from 3.7 nm CdS QDs to Pt. Half-life times ( 1/2, when 50% of initial signal decays), which is another commonly used parameter in some relevant transient absorption work, follows the same trend and is also included in Table 1.…”
Section: Please Do Not Adjust Marginssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The electron transfer rate from the smallest CdS QDs to Pt is comparable to typical rates from QDs to various acceptors including oxides, inorganic complexes, organic compounds and carbon allotropes. [3][4][5][6][7] More relevantly, a rate constant of 1.22 × 10 9 s -1 was found from 3.6 nm CdSe QDs to Pt, 17 which is close to that measured here from 3.7 nm CdS QDs to Pt. Half-life times ( 1/2, when 50% of initial signal decays), which is another commonly used parameter in some relevant transient absorption work, follows the same trend and is also included in Table 1.…”
Section: Please Do Not Adjust Marginssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Similar phenomena have been observed for charge transfer from QDs to various acceptors including oxides, inorganic complexes, organic compounds and carbon allotropes mainly used for photovoltaics applications. [3][4][5][6][7] In order to provide more physical insights, we perform a quantitative analysis of our result. If electron transfer to Pt is dominant additional pathway for the excited-state interaction between CdS and Pt, we can evaluate the rate constant by comparing the bleaching recovery lifetimes in the presence and absence of Pt.…”
Section: Please Do Not Adjust Marginsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(i) Too many charge-separation events can lead to charge-carrier accumulation, giving rise to carrier leakage and recombination. (ii) Small p-type and/or n-type domain sizes can inhibit depletion-layer (i.e., built-in potential) formation because of spatial confinement, reducing the open-circuit voltage ( V OC ). ,, Therefore, controlling p–n heterojunction areas is important for achieving high device performance. However, finding proper methods to control the heterojunction areas remains a big challenge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, we demonstrate p-n heterojunction area control in CdTe/CdSe NC solar cells by using self-assembled QDs. The solar cells have CdTe NCs as electron acceptors and CdSe NCs as electron donors, based on their cascaded band edge alignments (i.e., the conduction and valence band edge positions of CdTe are higher in energy than the corresponding ones of CdSe), , and the p–n heterojunction is formed at the CdTe/CdSe interface . We evaluate the performances of photovoltaic devices with controlled interfacial areas between the p-type CdTe domains and n-type CdSe domains, fabricated using the three-dimensional (3D) supra-QD (SQD) structures and one-dimensional nanorod (NR) structures, as a proof-of-concept study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%