Improving Society by Improving Education through Service-Dominant Logic: Reframing the Role of Students in Higher Education

Abstract

The role of higher education (HE) in the development of societies is an unquestionable fact, and its management has traditionally been a major concern of governments. Lately, there has been worldwide debate on whether universities should adopt traditional management practices as applied in any business sector. This paper questions the adoption of these practices, because they tend to simplify the complexity of this service, and argues that service-dominant logic (SDL) is a more appropriate approach to manage HE institutions. It envisions HE as a complex system where many actors interact to co-create value and focuses on the student–teacher dyad. Through a critical literature review, this paper states that the increasing established analogy of the ‘student–customer’ and ‘teacher–provider’, adopted to simplify the complexity of the HE service and thus allow the implementation of traditional management practices, jeopardizes the sustainability of social development due to its effects on the long-term quality of professionals’ training. Then, under the frame of SDL, we define students as co-creators of value (rather than customers) and teachers as value proposers, providing new insights to the debate and critical new recommendations for policymakers and universities to manage this critical relationship.

Measurement of sustainable higher education development: Evidence from China

“…Before the 1990s, the concepts of University 1.0, 2.0 and 3.0, highlighting the aims of universities, were proposed. University 1.0 was primarily concerned with the development of educational institutions themselves; University 2.0 mainly focused on the coordination of teaching and research of universities [7], and University 3.0 added a new aspect: the contribution of knowledge to society and economics [8]. These three versions of the aims have become the basis of higher education institutions' competitiveness and have received much attention from stakeholders.…”

Does Executive MBA Deliver? Exploration of Developmental Outcomes and Participants’ Perceptions of Delivery Effectiveness

“…However, compared with importance domain, respondents' low score on performance of the Executive MBA program might indicate the inability of the institution to gauge the evolving needs of individuals and corporations that were to be inculcated in the program. Executive education programs need continuous transformation towards market orientation by reflecting the true demands of individuals and corporations (Díaz-Méndez, et al, 2019). Bandera, et al (2020) and Reid, et al (2020) have criticized the traditional curriculum and a credible program requires a dynamic approach that leads to further research.…”

Evaluation of Scientific Research in Universities Based on the Idea of Education for Sustainable Development

“…Teaching, research, and contribution to society are the three main functions of modern universities [57,58]. Scientific research activity aims at knowledge production, and the process is also beneficial for student cultivation and social development.…”