2009
DOI: 10.1002/elps.200800497
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving sensitivity in micro‐free flow electrophoresis using signal averaging

Abstract: Microfluidic free-flow electrophoresis (μFFE) is a separation technique that separates continuous streams of analytes as they travel through an electric field in a planar flow channel. The continuous nature of the μFFE separation suggests that approaches more commonly applied in spectroscopy and imaging may be effective in improving sensitivity. The current paper describes the S/N improvements that can be achieved by simply averaging multiple images of a μFFE separation; 20-24-fold improvements in S/N were obs… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recent applications of μFFE have been designed to take advantage of this continuous analysis. For example, μFFE images can be averaged over time resulting in an improvement in signal to noise proportional to the square root of the number of images recorded 21. Fonslow and Bowser first demonstrated gradient μFFE as a method for determining optimum separation conditions for mixture of fluorescently labeled amino acids 22.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recent applications of μFFE have been designed to take advantage of this continuous analysis. For example, μFFE images can be averaged over time resulting in an improvement in signal to noise proportional to the square root of the number of images recorded 21. Fonslow and Bowser first demonstrated gradient μFFE as a method for determining optimum separation conditions for mixture of fluorescently labeled amino acids 22.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, stable μFFE separations have been demonstrated over a periods of minutes but longer separations have proven problematic 22 Figure 6. shows the separation of three fluorescent dyes (rhodamine 123, rhodamine 110, fluorescein) recorded over the course of approximately 2 hours in 25 mM HEPES at pH 7.00 with 300 μM Triton X-100 included in the carrier buffer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead the formation of bubbles at the electrode surface due to electrolysis has proven to be the most difficult issue. These bubbles disrupt the flow pattern and electric field in the device, giving rise to unpredictable analyte flow paths 22. Devices fabricated which do not incorporate design aspects to mediate the effect of electrolysis bubbles are limited to very low applied voltages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Bowser group from the University of Minnesota has made several contributions to FFE since 2008 [10][11][12]22]. In one study, Fonslow and Bowser used a microchip with varying depths to study the effects of a buffer concentration gradient on separations [10] and in another study, to separate mitochondria [11].…”
Section: Ffementioning
confidence: 98%